Student Publications


Author: Felix Mmboyi
Title:
Sustainable Agricultural Development
Area:
Country :
Profile:
Program:

Available for Download: Yes


Sharing knowledge is a vital component in the growth and advancement of our society in a sustainable and responsible way. Through Open Access, AIU and other leading institutions through out the world are tearing down the barriers to access and use research literature. Our organization is interested in the dissemination of advances in scientific research fundamental to the proper operation of a modern society, in terms of community awareness, empowerment, health and wellness, sustainable development, economic advancement, and optimal functioning of health, education and other vital services. AIU’s mission and vision is consistent with the vision expressed in the Budapest Open Access Initiative and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. Do you have something you would like to share, or just a question or comment? We would be happy to hear from you, please use the Request Info link below.

For more information on the AIU's Open Access Initiative, click here.

 


 
AIU Mission Vision
Bachelor Study
Masters Study
Doctoral Study
Areas of Study
Tuition
Press Room
Testimonials
Video Conferences
Open Access
Apply Online
 
 
 
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA: POTENTIAL
STRATEGIES

ABSTRACT

Low agricultural productivity, land degradation and poverty are severe interrelated
problems in the East African highlands. While the proximate causes of such problems are
relatively well known, the underlying causes are many and complex, and depend upon
many site-specific factors that vary greatly across the diverse circumstances of the region.
Thus, no one-size-fits-all policy, institutional or technology strategy is likely to suffice
to generate sustainable development. While common elements of successful strategies do
exist, such as security and macroeconomic stability, the appropriate portfolio of
investments in physical, human, natural and social capital will likely be different in
different circumstances.

In this paper, i argue that the appropriate strategy for sustainable development depends
greatly upon the pathways of development that are feasible in a given location.

Development pathways represent common patterns of change in economic livelihood
strategies, such as continued semi-subsistence mixed crop-livestock production or
commercialization of high-value perishable crops. I argue that such development
pathways will be largely determined by three factors determining comparative advantage:
agricultural potential, access to markets, and population density. Based on a typology of
situations in the East African highlands using these variables, I develop hypotheses about
the potential pathways of development in different situations, and the policy and
institutional requisites to achieve sustainable development of such pathways. I also argue
that the choice of development pathway largely conditions the opportunities for particular
resource management technologies, and develop hypotheses about the technological
strategies that may be feasible within particular development pathways.

I conclude the paper with hypotheses about the priorities for policy intervention to
achieve sustainable development in the East African highlands. Among these, I suggest
that the highest priority for road and irrigation development should be areas close to
urban markets with high agricultural potential; that development of input and output
markets and credit systems will be most critical in such areas; that increasing food
security through increased food crop production or other means is likely to be a key to
realizing the potential for more commercial production; that subsidies on the costs of
transporting fertilizer to remote, high-potential, food deficit areas should be considered as
a lower cost alternative to food aid; and that intensified and more private use of hillsides
and grazing areas for sustainable uses such as tree planting may have potential to achieve
more rapid and sustainable development of lower potential areas. I emphasize that these
are only hypotheses, and that policy research is needed to assess their validity in different
contexts of the East African highlands


4

1.0 INTRODUCTION

In Sub-Saharan Africa, the nexus of population pressure, low and declining agricultural
productivity, and unsustainable use of natural resources threatens a downward spiral of
increasing poverty and land degradation unless effective strategies to reverse the spiral
are identified and implemented. Cleaver and Schreiber (1994). These problems are
particularly severe in the East African highlands. Average population density is more
than 1 person per hectare in the highlands and well over 2 persons per hectare in many
areas. Most farm households attempt to subsist on less than 1 hectare of land and incomes
of much less than $1 per day. Cereal yields are well below yields attained in other parts
of the world (averaging little more than 1 tonne per hectare for most cereals), while yield
growth has been slow or in some cases, declining over the past several decades.
Hoeckstra and Corbett (1995). Livestock productivity is also low compared to other parts
of the world. For example, milk yields are less than 4 liters per day in the highlands
Winrock International (1992). These trends are all the more distressing because
agricultural potential is quite high in much of the East African highlands, with sufficient
rainfall and suitable soils to support much more intensive and profitable agriculture than
currently exists.

The proximate causes of these problems are well known. Bojo and Cassells (1995);
Sanchez et al. (1997): increased cultivation on steep slopes, inadequate vegetative cover
on croplands, deforestation, overgrazing, burning of crop residues and dung for fuel, low
use of inorganic fertilizers or integrated nutrient management, declining use of fallow,
and limited adoption of soil and water conservation measures. Underlying these
proximate causes are many more fundamental factors, including population growth,
poverty, insecure land tenure, limited access to markets and credit, risks associated with
the use of inputs and new technologies, and limited farmer knowledge of appropriate
technologies in some cases. Government policies and institutions affect most of these
causes. For example, market liberalization, credit policies, input supply policies and
infrastructure investment have a large impact on opportunities to use inorganic fertilizers
Bumb and Banaante (1996). Land tenure policies may affect security of tenure, land.
fragmentation, and access to credit, and hence affect incentives and ability to invest in
land improvements or to use inputs. Place and Hazell (1993). Education affects
population growth and poverty. Education, research and extension policies can affect
farmer knowledge about specific natural resource problems (e.g., types of nutrients
required) and appropriate technologies to address such problems.

Given the complexity of factors influencing land degradation and the diversity of
situations existing in the Kenyan highlands, no single package of technologies will be
able to address all of the problems. Similarly, no one-size-fits-all policy strategy will
suffice to generate sustainable development, although there will be common elements to
successful strategies in all cases, including macroeconomic stability, a competitive
market environment, land tenure security, and investments in physical, human, natural
and social capital. Much of what distinguishes different strategies will be differences in
the portfolio of such investments that are needed in different circumstances.


5

The objectives of this paper are to begin to identify such strategies, to suggest what kinds
of strategies are appropriate for different types of situations, and to consider the policy
and institutional requisites for these strategies to be successful. The suggestions will be
offered as hypotheses rather than as firm conclusions, since substantial empirical research
is still needed to investigate the feasibility and desirability of the suggested strategies and
supporting policy and institutional interventions.

In this paper, i argue that the nature of land degradation problems and appropriate means
of addressing them will depend upon the broader development pathway that is pursued.
For example, in areas where commercial crop production is occurring, the potential to
address soil nutrient depletion using large inputs of inorganic fertilizer will be much
greater than where production is likely to remain mainly subsistence-oriented. The latter
situation will require lower use of external inputs, although opportunities for integrating
small amounts of purchased inputs with local sources of inputs should not be overlooked.

I also argue that the policy and institutional strategy, particularly the appropriate mix of
public and private investments, should be linked to the pathway of development. For
example, areas where a commercialization pathway is viable may require development of
input and output markets through private or public investment in transportation and
marketing facilities, credit, etc. Appropriately targeted and sustained research and
technical assistance will be important to all strategies, but especially where a low external
input (and knowledge intensive) pathway is pursued.

The appropriate development pathway depends upon the factors that determine local
comparative advantage. Three factors of particular importance in this regard are
agricultural potential, population density, and access to markets. Accordingly, i consider
development pathways suitable to different circumstances along these three dimensions,
and present examples from the highlands of Kenya. In the next two sections i present a
brief overview of the agricultural context and the policy environment in each of these
three countries. In section 4, i consider possible development pathways for different
situations and in section 5, i consider the policy and institutional strategies to facilitate
such pathways. In section 6, we offer tentative policy conclusions and directions for
further research

1.1 AGRICULTURE IN KENYA

The Kenyan highlands stretch from the eastern slopes of Mt. Elgon southward through
Nyanza province to the Tanzanian border and eastward through a narrow section of the
rift valley and then expanding once more to cover the Aberdere range, Mount Kenya, and
environs to the south and east. In total, the highlands cover approximately 18 percent of
the land area. The highlands generally include the better agricultural areas and as a
consequence population densities are high. It is estimated that 64 percent of Kenya's
population resides in this relatively small area and many local areas have population
densities in excess of 1,000 inhabitants per square kilometer. Braun et al. (1997). Most
highland areas enjoy two rainy seasons, the long season from March to June and the short

6

rainy season from October to December. Average annual rainfall is generally over 1,200
mm with much higher amounts reported in the higher elevations near Mount Kenya. The
climate in the western highlands is warm year round with average temperatures of 21 o C.
In the higher elevation central highlands, temperatures are somewhat cooler, with average
high temperatures reaching as low as 18 o C in certain months of the year.

Soils throughout the highlands are generally deep, well drained, clay-loams and are
considered of medium to high agricultural potential. Nitisols dominate in the central
highlands and are derived from volcanic rock. The central highlands are characterized by
moderate to steep sloping land and thus there is a need for soil conservation measures to
ensure continued productivity of soils. As discussed in more detail below, there are not
widespread problems of soil infertility in the central highlands due to the commercial
nature of agriculture and farmer reinvestment in land. In western Kenya, there is a major
problem of nutrient depletion in the otherwise high-potential ferralsols, acrisols, and
nitisols. For example, phosphorus has been found to be severely depleted (Olson P levels
below 5 ppm) in widespread soil testing. ICRAF (1997). In addition, some of the soils are
high phosphorus fixing, implying that much of the phosphorus in the soil is not available
to plants. Sanchez et al. (1997). Nitrogen is another major limiting nutrient and potassium
deficiencies are also reported. These are not inherent characteristics of the soils, but
rather a result of many decades of continuous cropping and nutrient export with little
nutrient input.

Throughout most of the highlands, land registration and consolidation exercises had taken
place in the 1960s. In central Kenya, the results of this were single-parcel farms of
between 3 and 8 hectares. In the sloping areas, these normally stretched from a ridge
down a slope to a bottom valley area. After a generation or so of land subdivision,
average farm sizes generally range from 1 to 4 hectares. Relative to other rural areas, this
region generates high agricultural income and households are able to educate their
children, many of whom take up jobs in the non-agricultural sector, partially easing the
pressure for land subdivision. The updating of titles following transfers of land is
commonly practiced in this area relative to the western highlands. Place and Migot-
Adholla (1998). In the western highlands, farms are more or less the same size, with the
exception that in some of the most densely populated areas, farm sizes of below 1 hectare
are common. In both areas, the most common form of land acquisition is through
inheritance. Some purchasing of land takes place, but renting of land, though growing in
significance, has not traditionally been important. In both areas, there is much off-farm
activity as some family members will seek employment in the major cities.

Two important distinctions between the western and central highlands are the higher
elevation and closer proximity to Nairobi (and the shipping port) of the central highlands.
The higher elevation has permitted the productive cultivation of perennials such as coffee
and tea, and the proximity to Nairobi has provided a ready market for cash activities such
as dairy production. In the central highlands there is consequently a wide range of both
cash and food crops grown. The major cash crops are tea (in the higher elevations),
coffee, miraa (a stimulant), macademia nuts, fruit trees such as avocado, and vegetables.
The major food crops are maize, beans, irish potatoes, bananas and an assortment of

7

vegetables. In addition, livestock production, mainly for milk, is extremely important and
in most areas over 80 percent of households own cattle. Minae et al. (1988).
Consequently, sizeable land area is devoted to production of fodder, such as napier grass.
Murithi (1998).

Farmers market coffee and tea through cooperatives, the local tea and coffee societies,
and their widespread establishment has facilitated expansion of these commodities. The
area under tea production has steadily increased to where Kenya is now the world's
second largest exporter of tea. Coffee production remains an important provider of
foreign exchange but production levels have been more volatile. Dairy has been a major
growth industry both during the monopoly period of the Kenya Cooperative Creameries
(KCC) and since the liberalization of the sector in the early 1990s. Horticulture is also
important in the central highlands. Flowers are restricted to larger farmers but
smallholders are engaged in pyrethrum, tobacco, french beans, macadamia, and other
fruits and vegetables.

One of the benefits of the cooperatives was to provide credit for inputs and sometimes
other investments. This meant that as long as output prices were attractive, farmers
normally had the interest and capacity to apply fertilizer inputs to their cash crops. For
coffee, for instance, Kenyan farmers normally add nutrient inputs, as opposed to farmers
in Uganda. The access to credit also had spillover effects into other crops and
investments such as education. Thus, one of the features of the central highlands is the
development of a highly diversified and intensified agricultural system. There remain
poor households, but opportunities to improve livelihoods through agriculture abound.
The case of western Kenya is different. There are only isolated areas suitable for
production of cash crops such as coffee or sugarcane. There is a sizeable regional demand
from a large rural population and the presence of several small cities, but the distance to
the largest cities and key tourist areas is relatively long and transport costs high. As a
result, in comparison with the central highlands, the profitability of agriculture has
traditionally been lower and farmers have in turn reinvested very little in agriculture. The
general description is of low-input semi-subsistence farming systems. Maize and bean
systems dominate, but in some areas bananas are common and in others sorghum and
millet can be found. There is also some growing of cassava and sweet potato.

The higher valued crops in the system are the vegetables such as French bean, kale,
cabbage, onion, pepper, and tomato. Tea is grown in some parts of the western highlands,
though not as common as in the central highlands. Livestock (particularly crossbreeds)
are also not as common as in the central highlands, and are normally confined to the
wealthier households who utilize them for milk, manure, and sometimes ploughing.
Yields of most crops are low and households normally must buy additional food to
supplement production. In addition, acute demands for cash, for education fees for
example, force households into selling food crops at low prices following harvest and
buying them later at much higher prices. Western Kenya is a net importer of food




8

2.0 POLICIES AND INSITUTIONS AFFECTING AGRICULTURE
DEVELOPMENT IN KENYA

Here i consider the effects of recent changes in the policy environment on development in
the Kenyan highlands, and the major policy and institutional constraints that still appear
to inhibit development potential

The Government of Kenya implemented a structural adjustment program beginning in
1986 and elements of this program are still being carried out such as the privatization of
state enterprises. The reforms have targeted both macro-economic areas as well as
sectoral areas, including agriculture. The government relaxed foreign exchange
regulations and by 1995, the private sector could move currencies relatively freely. Tariff
rates were reduced on many goods and the import/export sectors were freed up from
excessive licensing restrictions. The shilling was allowed to be market determined (with
the typical stabilization influence by the central bank) and interest rates were also freed to
market forces. After the elections in 1992, the government ceased the printing of money
to finance government shortfalls and was forced into meeting imbalances through
borrowing. Following this, inflation has increasingly been under control, averaging at or
below 10 percent since 1996. Real interest rates, on the other hand, increased
dramatically as the government had to pay high interest rates in order to raise the
significant amount of funds it required. Much of the government debt was held by
commercial banks which tended to choke off domestic private lending. The high real
interest rates attracted foreign funds and this helped to maintain a strong shilling over this
time (1995-1999). The recent macro-economic indicators have generally been well
received by the World Bank and IMF.

The government has had difficulty in funding its planned public expenditure program.
Government revenues have almost annually been disappointing with much evasion of tax.
When the IMF also withdrew its financing mechanism, the government has had to
respond by reducing expenditures. This has meant that infrastructure revitalization and
development has been slowed. The El Niņo rains of 1997-98 further damaged the poor
infrastructure. Funds for agricultural research and extension have also been tight, and
have relied to a large extent on donor support. The government has reduced costs by
retrenchment in some ministries and in parastatals. The Kenya Revenue Authority has
also recently been given more latitude to collect taxes and in 1998 tax collections actually
exceeded target levels. The government has also introduced cost- sharing mechanisms in
many sectors such as education and health.

In agriculture, important policy areas include inputs, credit, output, research and
extension, land tenure, and land management. The agricultural input sector in Kenya has
been one of the bright spots. Even prior to SAP, Kenya had abandoned subsidies for
fertilizers and other inputs. Following liberalization, the government has slowly allowed
competition in the sector to grow. The fertilizer sector, though already quite competitive
relative to other countries in Africa, was decontrolled in 1990 and the number of
importers and distributors has reached 23 by 1997. Nyoro (1999). In response, the
number of types of fertilizer on the market has increased four-fold. The seed sector also

9

involves several major firms that compete with the Kenya Seed Company. The
government has long had an interest in increasing the availability of credit to farmers.
State supported credit is channeled through the Agricultural Finance Corporation (AFC),
the Coffee Marketing Board, and the Kenya Tea Development Authority. The AFC
though does not lend to smallholder farmers (a farmer must have at least 5 hectares of
land). As in Ethiopia, lending to the livestock sector is constrained in Kenya. For
example, Freeman et al. (1998b) found that a 1-percent increase in credit for purchasing
crossbred dairy cows leads to 1.6 percent increase in milk productivity on credit
constrained farms and 0.9 percent increase in productivity on non-constrained farms.

Private financial institutions rarely lend for agricultural purposes and when they do, only
to large farmers with considerable collateral. Recent years have seen the launching of
micro-finance projects, but only a few have targeted agriculture. Despite these
mechnisms, it is estimated that only 10 percent of credit goes to agriculture while it
contributes over 30 percent of GDP. Mwangi (1999).

There has been increased devolution of control and participation in the marketing of
output by the state, but this has been a slow and rough process. Maize, the most important
food crop has been largely freed from government regulation. Price supports and
movement restrictions have disappeared. The National Cereal Produce Board (NCPB)
still exists with the mandate to stockpile foodstuffs for national food security, but there is
a thriving private sector that buys and sells maize throughout Kenya.

Moreover, the NCPB itself has become a commercial enterprise and has reduced staff by
65 percent between 1993-98. Mwangi (1999). The Kenyan government is still highly
involved in the marketing of coffee, tea, sugar, and meat. Government parastatals are the
sole buyer for tea and coffee, which are especially important in the highlands. Producer
prices generally follow world prices and therefore Kenyan coffee farmers have not been
spared the shocks of volatile world coffee prices. Production of coffee fluctuates widely
in response to prices and as well to the speed of payment by the coffee board, which has
often been slow in the past. The Kenya Tea Development Authority, on the other hand,
has performed relatively well and tea area has continued to expand among smallholders
in Kenya. For both coffee and tea, marketing outlets are well distributed through key
growing areas in the highlands. The dairy sector had been tightly controlled by the Kenya
government through the mid-1990s, when restrictions of selling milk to the parastatal,
Kenya Co-operative Creameries (KCC), were eased. KCC now buys a small share of
total milk production and is in negotiation with a foreign firm to form a joint venture. The
state still has strong influence on prices and incentives for some crops through their
import policies, which in the case of maize, sugar, and wheat remain politically
influenced.

Research, extension, and other agricultural information services in Kenya, while not up to
the resource levels of Asian countries, compare favorably with other African countries.
Agricultural research has a legacy of emphasizing cash crops for the larger farmers, but
the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute has now decentralized into many locations to
focus on the particular needs of smallholder farmers in those areas. Kenya has pursued

10

the Training and Visit approach to extension and this has had poor results in some areas
due to low extension worker to farmer ratios and limited transport resources. The
government, however, is a supporter of new approaches and has facilitated the
introduction of the catchment approach for soil conservation and the many innovative
methods used by an array of NGOs.

Land tenure is largely secure for rural households and this is particularly the case in the
highlands. Thus, farmers' willingness to invest is not hampered by uncertainty of land
rights. The government has also spearheaded efforts to promote sustainable agriculture
through the establishment of the permanent presidential commission on soil conservation
and afforestation. In response, production and distribution of tree seed and seedlings was
actively promoted and farmers throughout the highlands continue to plant trees for
various purposes. The Ministry of Agriculture embarked on an ambitious soil
conservation program in the late 1970s and the National Soil and Water Conservation.
Program is recognized globally as one of the most successful conservation program, now
reaching 100,000 farmers per year.

Kenya has long adopted a strategy to increase local level planning. Thus, sectoral plans
are developed with inputs from district level plans. While this decentralization has been
in place for some time, unlike in Uganda and Ethiopia, there has not been much
movement towards actual devolution of power. The executive branch retains most
political power and continues to make appointments at local administrative levels and it
these appointments who provide most of the inputs into local planning. The state had,
until 1996, also appointed the directors of the Kenya Farmers Association. The executive
branch also develops strategic plans for the country. Recognizing the continued high rural
population growth rates and continuing miniaturization of farms, the government has set
a goal of becoming a semi-industrialized nation within the next few decades. There will
be considerable obstacles in meeting this challenge, and widening the tax base to ease
rates of taxation and interest will be among the first tasks. Public investments in
transport, energy, and communication infrastructure will also be required. There will be
keen competition for scarce funds from both the urban and rural sectors, most notably in
social programs for education and health

2.1 STRATEGIES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Over the past decade, a consensus has begun to emerge about many common features
required for successful development strategies in Africa, most of them following standard
neoclassical prescriptions. Delgado (1995; World Bank (1994); Cleaver and Schreiber
(1994). General peace and security are needed to allow a climate favorable to production
and investment. Macroeconomic policies that ensure a low and stable inflation rate are
needed to reduce risks and allow development of the financial system. Foreign exchange
and trade policies should be liberalized to avoid a bias against tradable goods.
Competition should be allowed to develop in domestic markets to promote efficient
allocation of scarce resources.


11

Although this consensus is very helpful in encouraging governments to stop doing things
that have had negative impacts on development (such as foreign exchange and domestic
price controls), it is less helpful in providing guidance to governments on what they
should do. A useful general principle to guide government action is to undertake those
actions that yield high social net returns and that would not be done as well by some
other means in the absence of government action. According to this principle,
governments should intervene mainly to provide public goods (goods such as research or
rural roads whose benefits are largely non rival and non excludable, and hence not
adequately provided by private markets); to address other market failures such as
externalities (such as caused by environmental pollution or water use), missing markets
(such as absence of credit and savings markets), and imperfect competition (such as
monopoly power); or to address equity considerations such as problems of deep seated
poverty.

To move from this general principle to specific actions, it is helpful to think of different
pathways of development that may be appropriate in different circumstances. As
mentioned in the introduction, the appropriate pathway of development depends upon
current and potential comparative advantage. The returns to alternative policy and
technology strategies in different locations will depend upon the potential comparative
advantages. For example, investments in research and extension linked to adoption of
improved cereal varieties and heavy use of inorganic fertilizer are likely to yield much
higher returns where rainfall is relatively assured than in drought-prone areas where use
of such inputs can be very risky. Highly labor intensive methods of soil and water
conservation, such as building terraces or composting, are more likely to be adopted in
more densely populated and less commercialized areas, where the opportunity cost of
labor is low. Adoption of animal traction technologies is likely to yield higher returns in
areas with heavy clay soils than in areas with light, erodible soils. Strategies relying on
heavy use of purchased inputs and credit are unlikely to be successful in remote areas
where high transport and marketing costs make subsistence agriculture the dominant
development pathway, even if they are able to cause substantial improvements in
productivity. Similarly, commercial dairy production is likely to develop in peri-urban
areas but not in remote areas.

Many factors combine to determine comparative advantage and the appropriate response
to it. We will focus on three factors that i believe are critical: agricultural potential,
access to markets, and population pressure. Agricultural potential is an abstraction of
many factors including rainfall, altitude, soil type and depth, topography, presence of
pests and diseases, and others that influence the absolute (as opposed to comparative)
advantage of producing agricultural commodities in a particular place.

There are of course variations in potential depending upon which commodities are being
considered. Furthermore, agricultural potential is not a static concept but changes over
time in response to changing natural conditions (such as climate change) as well as
human-induced conditions (such as land degradation). For simplicity of exposition,
however, we will sweep aside these important considerations and discuss agricultural
potential as though it was a one dimensional and fixed concept. In reality, the multi-

12

dimensional and dynamic nature of agricultural potential should be considered when
developing more specific strategies of development than will be possible in this paper.
Access to markets is critical for determining the comparative advantage of a given
location, given its agricultural potential. For example, a community with an absolute
advantage in producing perishable vegetables (i.e., total factor productivity in vegetable
production is higher there than anywhere else), may have little or no comparative
advantage (low profitability) in vegetable production if it is far from roads and urban
markets. As with agricultural potential, market access is also a multi-dimensional and
dynamic concept (distance to roads, condition of roads, distance to urban centers, degree
of competition, access to transport facilities, etc.), but we will treat it as a single
predetermined variable (though subject to change through investments in roads, for
example).

Population pressure affects the labor intensity of agriculture by affecting the land/labor
ratio, and may also induce innovations in technology, markets and institutions, or
investments in infrastructure. Boserup (1965); Ruthenberg (1980); Hayami and Ruttan
(1985); Binswanger and McIntire (1987). Population pressure thus affects the
comparative advantage of labor intensive pathways of development, as well as returns to
various types of investments. We take average population density as an indicator of
population pressure, although one could argue that population density per unit of arable
land would be a better indicator. Absence of comparable data on this latter indicator
makes it difficult to use in practice, however. To some extent, differences in agricultural
potential will account for differences in arable land per total area of land (i.e., the fraction
of arable land is likely lower in areas with lower agricultural potential, controlling for
population density).

These three factors interact with each other in complex ways. Population density tends to
be higher where there is greater agricultural potential or greater market access, since
people have moved to such areas in search of better opportunities. On the other hand,
population pressure may have contributed to land degradation, reducing agricultural
potential from what it once was. Market access tends to be better where there is higher
population density, since the per capita costs of building roads are lower and the benefits
higher in such circumstances. Market access also tends to be better where agricultural
potential is higher, since the returns to developing infrastructure are greater.

Despite these interrelationships, there is still substantial independent variation of these
factors in the East African highlands. Given such variations, and the fact that these
factors change relatively slowly over time, it is useful to consider how different
combinations of these factors influence possible development pathways. i can classify the
situations of the East African highlands into a maximum of eight types, considering
high and low levels of each dimension. I recognize that there is an unavoidable
element of arbitrariness in defining these terms. High agricultural potential refers to
areas with more than 1,000 mm of annual rainfall, at medium altitude (less than 3,000 m
elevation), and with soils suitable for agricultural production with minimum investment
(excluding very thin soils, vertisols, highly acidic soils, and those which are high P-
fixing). This includes most of the highlands of Uganda and Kenya, and most of the High-

13

Potential Perennial and High-Potential Cereals zones of Ethiopia. High market access
refers to areas relatively close to an urban center and with access to an all-weather road
and transport facilities. Although relative to other parts of Africa, population density is
high in all of the highlands, we consider high population density to mean greater than
175 persons per square kilometer. This includes most of the highlands of Kenya and
southwestern Uganda, and some of the highlands of Ethiopia. Braun et al. (1997).

Areas with high agricultural potential but low market access have more of a comparative
advantage in producing high-value (relative to their volume) non-perishable commodities
(such as coffee or tea) that can be transported over relatively long distances. Given the
high costs and risks of depending on imported food into such areas, farmers are likely to
continue producing most of their own food crops until improvements in roads and
transportation services, as well as increased production of food crops in other regions,
allow imported food to be more economical and less risky. At this stage of development,
complementary linkages between crop and livestock production are important, with
animals providing a source of draft power, manure and food protein, and crop residues an
important source of feed. McIntire et al. (1992). Thus, intensified livestock production
may be beneficial as well, particularly in lower population density areas with more
available land to provide fodder. There is good potential for adoption of purchased
inputs, financed by sales of cash crops or livestock, as a way to improve local food
supplies as well as income. This can result from use of inputs on both types of crops, and
by freeing up land and labor from food crop production for cash crop production.
However, where perennial cash crop production is not yet well established or not very
profitable (but potential exists), the need for subsistence food production may undermine
the ability to take advantage of such cash crop potential.

There may be potential to build upon the soil and water conservation investments being
made in moisture-stressed areas, by promoting targeted and limited use of fertilizer and
improved seeds to the parts of the fields where soil moisture is greatest. However, such a
limited and adaptive approach is not presently being pursued. For this approach to be
economically feasible, sources of income to finance input purchases are needed. Where
population density is high, farms in such low-potential environments are unlikely to be
able to produce sufficient surplus to finance purchase of inputs. Thus this will be most
feasible closer to urban areas where off-farm sources of income are available, where rural
industries such as mining are developing, or where seasonal migration (or remittances
from permanent migrants) is common. In vertisol areas, as in many parts of central
Ethiopia, increased food crop production depends upon investments to address the
problems of drainage and waterlogging. While technologies have recently been
developed to address these problems (such as the broad bed maker), adoption is not yet
widespread. Gezehegn and Heidhues (1998). Factors inhibiting adoption of the broad bed
maker include appear to include inadequate training in its appropriate use, limited
availability of complementary inputs (especially seed and fertilizer), and low output/input
price ratios resulting from removal of fertilizer subsidies and poor infrastructure (ibid.).




14


2.2 POLICY AND INSTITUTIONAL REQUISITES

The policy and institutional requirements of sustainable development will depend upon
which development pathways are pursued. Here i consider some of the critical constraints
affecting the pathways discussed in the previous section, and the policy and institutional
requisites to address these constraints. I also consider some of the implications of these
pathways for sustainable land management.

2.3 HIGH EXTERNAL INPUT INTENSIFICATION OF FOOD CROP
PRODUCTION

The first requirement of this pathway is the availability of food crop varieties that will
respond well to fertilizer and other inputs in the conditions of the Kenyan highlands.

To have the broadest and most sustainable economic impact, promotion of such
technologies should account for local potentials and economic conditions as much as
possible. As discussed previously, small farm sizes and uncertain rainfall (especially in
moisture-stressed areas) can make allocation of half-hectare plots to new technologies a
very risky strategy. This is less of a concern where rainfall is relatively assured or
irrigation exists, but many farmers even in these circumstances still may prefer to adopt a
more gradual or diversified approach, which may be precluded by a fixed package
approach such as being promoted in Ethiopia. In addition, adaptive and participatory
research is needed to develop more targeted recommendations for integrated nutrient
management practices; taking into account available sources of organic matter, local
sources of phosphate rock, and potential for leguminous crops or trees. Quinones et al.
(1997); Sanchez et al. (1997). The priority for such research in the near term should be
high-potential areas where this pathway is most feasible. For the longer term, continued
basic research is needed to develop varieties that are suitable under lower potential
conditions, such as in moisture-stressed environments or in acid soils.

Other positive efforts that can help develop such competitive markets include
investments in road construction and improvement and facilitation of the availability of
credit to private wholesalers and retailers to finance purchase of storage and marketing
facilities and working capital stocks. In remote food deficit areas where substantial
improvements in market access are not likely in the near future, consideration of the most
effective means to address poverty and food security should include consideration of
subsidizing the cost of transporting inputs to these areas (perhaps by continuing
government provision to these areas). Since 1 ton of fertilizer can yield 3-7 tons of
additional grain in higher potential areas. Mulat et al. (1997), it is much cheaper to
subsidize the cost of transporting fertilizer than grain (through food aid) to such areas as a
means of addressing food deficits. Subsidies are of course costly and difficult to maintain
as a long-term strategy, but are a lower cost alternative to providing food aid to relatively
high-potential, remote, food-deficit areas. There also can be difficulties in targeting
subsidies, if farmers try to resell the fertilizer to other areas where fertilizer is not
subsidized. This potential problem would be minimized, however, if the subsidy were

15

only on transport costs. The longer term solution for such areas is to invest in improved
infrastructure and transport services, but people still must be able to feed themselves in
the near term.

The high external input pathway may facilitate more sustainable land management.
Investments in soil and water conservation will be more attractive to private farmers
since the value of land and the need to minimize losses of valuable inputs through erosion
and runoff will be increased. In addition to direct benefits where such intensification
occurs, indirect benefits in other areas can also result, as increased supplies of biomass
reduce pressure on forests and grazing areas, and increased incomes provide alternatives
to expansion of production onto marginal lands.

The impacts of this strategy on restoring soil fertility are not assured however. Soil
fertility can be restored through increased use of fertilizer together with greater
production of organic material. However, a net increase in soil mining may occur even
with greater use of fertilizer, as a result of increased losses through erosion, leaching and
quantities harvested. For example, recent estimates from western Kenya show greater
nutrient mining on farms where there was more commercial orientation in food crop
production, suggesting that the profitability of using fertilizers in food crops may be
insufficient to prevent such depletion. De Jager et al. (1998). Further research is needed
on this issue.

In summary, to fully realize the potential benefits of a high external input strategy of
increasing food production, adequate attention must be paid to factors affecting the
feasibility and profitability of input use, including infrastructure, extension, input
availability, credit, and marketing facilities. In some cases where persistent food deficits
exist, subsidies on the costs of transporting inputs should be considered as a lower cost
alternative to food aid, until these other constraints can be overcome. IFPRI (1995).

2.4 LOW EXTERNAL INPUT INTENSIFICATION OF FOOD CROP
PRODUCTION

In lower potential areas without irrigation, the return to using external inputs, particularly
fertilizer, is likely to be much more limited. The strategy for intensifying food crop
production therefore must rely on a low (not zero) external input approach. In moisture
stressed areas, a critical need is to conserve and use the available soil moisture as
efficiently as possible, in combination with integrated use of limited amounts of
inorganic fertilizer with organic nutrient sources.

Research is also needed to better understand the potential for improving soil productivity
through integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers in different settings. Palm et al.
(1997). Organic sources vary greatly in terms of their biomass productivity and nutrient
content, their interactions with soil moisture and inorganic sources of nutrients, and their
impacts on productivity; and these issues are not yet well understood in Sub-Saharan
Africa (ibid.). For example, application of organic materials may reduce nutrient
availability to crops by immobilizing nitrogen, especially if the ratio of carbon to nitrogen

16

in the organic materials is high. Organic materials can also increase pest problems. On
the other hand, they may increase nutrient availability by reducing phosphorus fixation,
and improve soil physical properties and water holding capacity. It is also important to
recognize that many organic sources of nutrients (such as crop residues or manure
produced from grazing crop residues) only recycle nutrients within the farming system,
and do not add to the stock of nutrients in the system. As important as such recycling is to
help slow the rate of nutrient depletion, it cannot restore soil fertility. Biological nitrogen
fixation by leguminous plants, uptake by trees of nutrients that are unavailable to crops,
and transfer of biomass from outside the farm do increase the stock of nutrients available
to the farming system, and can be very important components of a low external input
strategy. However, these strategies cannot adequately restore phosphorus where it is
depleted. Sanchez et al. (1997). Thus, some use of inorganic fertilizer is an essential
component of strategies to restore soil fertility and increase agricultural productivity,
especially where phosphorus depletion is a major problem.

A critical constraint on increased use of organic material in low-potential areas is the
shortage of such material and high demand to use it for other purposes (particularly in
high population density areas) such as burning of dung and grazing of crop residues. It is
thus difficult to address the soil fertility problem in such areas without addressing the
larger problem of a shortage of biomass. One way to address this issue is to make better
use of degraded lands and communal grazing areas to produce biomass. The key to
success seems to be to provide the right set of incentives. The community approach to
planting woodlots has yielded limited benefits in Kenya whereas allowing individuals to
receive private benefits from tree planting (with secure tenure) shows promise of
achieving impressive results.

The impact of these new policies remain to be seen, but if they do result in a substantial
increase in tree planting and harvesting from wastelands, more manure and crop residues
can be recycled into crop production as fuelwood becomes more available. As the general
biomass shortage is reduced, the need for the most rapidly growing species (generally
eucalyptus) will decline, and other kinds of trees, such as fruit trees, legumes, and fodder
producing trees may become more attractive to plant. This will increase opportunities for
improving soil fertility and intensifying livestock production, as well as generating
income directly from tree products.

Improved management of pasture and grazing areas also could yield substantial benefits.
For example, area enclosures are being used to allow regeneration of natural grasses and
trees in many parts of the Ethiopian highlands. These are showing good results in terms
of regeneration, but there are common complaints from farmers that they are not
benefiting from the biomass being produced (where cut and carry or controlled grazing
systems have not been established). In addition, enclosures tend to increase pressure on
other unprotected areas, so the net impact on resource degradation is not necessarily
positive. To help ensure that positive benefits are achieved and felt by farmers, more
intensive management of grazing areas, such as planting and managing improved grasses
and trees, is needed. This could be approached by allocating such lands for private
grazing use or through better collective management of enclosures.

17


Because of economies of scale in protecting grazing areas and risk spreading advantages
of using them collectively, privatization of such lands may not be optimal. Baland and
Platteau (1996). However, attaining the benefits of collective management requires
effective institutions at the local level. Such institutions do not necessarily arise
spontaneously, even when the net benefits of effective collective action are large (ibid.).
Government or other external intervention can help to catalyze the development of such
institutions, though this requires a cautious approach that respects local autonomy and
concerns. Heavy-handed intervention from external agents can undermine the
development of such institutions, causing increased dependency on the regulatory role of
such external agents, and possibly increased conflicts in the community. Research is
needed to better understand the conditions under which effective institutions for
managing grazing lands arise and become sustainable in the Kenyan highlands, and how
governments and NGOs can help to promote rather than undermine this development.
Where this does occur, intensified livestock production, improved soil fertility
management, and increased incomes will also likely occur. Organic sources of crop
nutrients can also be generated on cropland. Many practices have been developed for this
purpose, such as hedgerow intercropping, improved fallows, green manures, composting,
and planting of fodder or multi-purpose trees. Cooper et al. (1996). High population
density and remoteness from markets favors more labor intensive practices (such as
hedgerow intercropping or composting) since opportunity costs of labor are lower in such
circumstances. ibid; Ehui et al. (1990). However, the potential of such approaches is
limited by the scarcity of water in the low- potential highlands. High population density
and small farm sizes will limit more extensive practices, such as improved fallows and
planting trees. In land scarce settings, planting of trees may be most feasible in particular
niches, such as in the homestead plot, on bunds and on plot boundaries. However,
planting on boundaries and bunds can create problems by competing with crops for water
and light on the owner's as well as neighbors' fields (ibid.).

Fragmentation may also prevent investments in land improvements such as planting fruit
trees or constructing soil bunds, since these may be subject to theft or damage by
neighbors if not easily supervised. For example, Olson (1995) reports cases of farmers in
the Kabale district of southwestern Uganda surreptitiously undermining terraces on plots
of their upstream neighbors, thus harvesting some of the fertile soil that had
accumulated in the terrace. Restrictions on land sales and leasing, as exist in Ethiopia,
contribute to the land fragmentation problem. However, the example from Uganda, where
such restrictions do not exist, suggests that reform of land policies would not necessarily
solve it.

Livestock grazing practices also can have a significant impact on the feasibility of some
kinds of land improving investments. For example, free grazing on farmland after the
harvest is common in much of the Ethiopian highlands. This likely limits the ability of
farmers to invest in planting many kinds of biological measures to control erosion and
restore soil fertility, since such measures may be destroyed by grazing or trampling.
Thus, improvements in management of farmlands may depend upon changes in the
grazing system and improvements in the management of grazing areas.

18


Other issues such as fertilizer and input credit supply are less important where a low
external input strategy is pursued than where a high input strategy is pursued, since such
areas will have lower demand for these inputs. Nevertheless, these areas should not be
neglected in this regard since the small amounts of inputs and credit they use may be
highly important. Other kinds of credit, particularly credit for productive nonagricultural
purposes (such as petty trading) and for consumption purposes may be highly important
in addressing problems of poverty and food insecurity. Development of road
infrastructure, storage facilities and the output marketing system will be less important to
such areas as suppliers of food, but critical to them as net importers of food.

2.5 INTENSIFICATION OF LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION

The most widespread technical constraint to intensified livestock production in Sub-
Saharan Africa is the availability of feed. McIntire et al. (1992); Winrock International
(1992). In the densely populated highlands, the prospects for relaxing this constraint
through increased forage production in farmlands is limited (except where high-value
dairy production exists), given the scarcity of land and food. McIntire et al. (1992).
Except in less densely populated parts of the highlands, the potential for increased fodder
production in communal grazing areas and wastelands is also limited, as discussed above.
Imported feed and feed concentrates are likely to be of limited use, except in very
commercialized systems such as dairy production in Kenya. This implies that the policy
and institutional requisites of cereal crop intensification discussed above are also critical
to livestock intensification.

Other important constraints to intensified livestock production in the Kenyan highlands
include animal diseases, limited stock of improved breeds, limited availability of
veterinary services and other inputs, poor infrastructure, and limited market and
institutional development. Winrock International (1992). While it is desirable to address
all of these constraints wherever they are binding, priority should be given in the near
term to places where there is substantial commercial potential and where the feed
constraint is not binding. For example, improved dairy breeds are not likely to be used
where adequate feed cannot be assured or only limited commercial potential exists, given
their cost and greater demand for feed. Returns to investment in veterinary services,
infrastructure and marketing facilities will be much greater where commercial potential
exists and feed is adequate than elsewhere. Thus, such efforts should be targeted in the
near term to areas close to urban markets, particularly where dairy potential exists, since
the returns to this activity are relatively high. McIntire et al. (1992); Jahnke (1982).

Development of dairy cooperatives may be a critical component of a strategy to develop
dairy production in areas of high market access. Because of the bulky, highly perishable,
and easily contaminated nature of fluid milk, the transaction costs and risks involved in
marketing milk are very high. Staal et al. (1997). Dairy cooperatives help to reduce risks
and transactions costs facing individual producers by pooling risk, reducing unit costs
due to economies of scale in collection and transport, making inputs available, and
enhancing their bargaining power. They reduce costs faced by processors by reducing

19

milk acquisition costs and assuring the quality and reliability of the supply. In addition,
dairy cooperatives may contribute to the development of social capital; for example, by
investing in education and health facilities.

Dairy cooperatives have played a potent role in dairy development in Kenya. The
government of Kenya has promoted dairy development for many years through the
Kenya Cooperative Creameries (KCC), which acts as a stable market outlet for
smallholder dairy producers and private cooperatives. This undoubtedly contributed to
the success of dairy development in Kenya, but has had problems in recent years as poor
financial performance of KCC (due in part to policies of pan territorial and pan seasonal
pricing) caused delays in payments to private cooperatives and producers (ibid.). The
Kenyan government liberalized the dairy industry in 1992, eliminating KCC's monopoly
on processed milk sales (but not on raw milk sales) in urban areas.

Development of other intensive commercial livestock enterprises such as beef fattening
and poultry and pork production is constrained mainly by the need for low-cost feed,
though religion also plays a strong role with regard to pork consumption. Where domestic
feed supplies are limited, avoiding restrictions on imported feed concentrates could help
such enterprises to develop. Once demand for such concentrates becomes sufficiently
developed, and domestic production of cereals increases sufficiently, local production of
feed concentrates may become profitable. Ensuring a policy environment attractive to
foreign and domestic investors could be an important element in facilitating such
development.

Development of such commercial intensive livestock industries would greatly increase
the availability of manure. Given the high cost of transporting manure, the direct impacts
on soil fertility would be limited mainly to areas close to the urban markets where these
industries develop. However, the increase in supply of such organic material might be
used to develop domestic industries supplying more concentrated fertilizer or fuel, which
could have a significant impact even in areas further from the urban market.

An attractive policy environment could also help facilitate investment in this type of
venture. In more remote areas, focusing on increased fodder production (through
increased cereal production, forage crops and/or fodder trees) may be the greatest
opportunity in the near term. Given improved fodder production, there will be
opportunities to promote increased productivity in small ruminant production,
particularly in lower population density settings, together with improved grazing land
management. Public measures to control or eliminate animal diseases are justified in
remote areas as well as commercial areas for both efficiency reasons (due to the public
goods nature of the investment) and to address rural poverty and food insecurity.

3.0 COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION OF PERISHABLE CASH CROPS

Where there is very good access to markets and irrigation or sufficiently reliable rainfall,
intensive commercial production of perishable fruits and vegetables can be very
profitable. As with intensified livestock production, the ability to pursue this strategy may

20

depend upon the success of increased productivity of cereal production, though for a
slightly different reason. Risk averse farmers with very little land are usually reluctant to
gamble on new and highly risky crops, however potentially profitable, unless their food
security is assured (von Braun et al. 1991). Such assurance need not depend only on local
food production though.

For example, small farmers in western Kenya are adopting vegetable crops and importing
maize from Uganda. Open trade policies thus can be very helpful in allowing such
commercialization to occur. Nonfarm income can also provide sufficient food security to
allow commercialization to occur (ibid.). But in cases such as in much of central Ethiopia
and parts of Uganda, where a potential comparative advantage in cereal production exists,
realizing that potential can be an important first step towards enabling farmers to
diversify into higher value products. Thus the requisites of high-external input
intensification of cereals also most likely help to promote intensive production of
perishable cash crops in such cases. At the same time, income earned from such cash
crop production can help farmers intensify food crop production, by enabling them to
purchase more inputs. Thus increased cash crop production and increased food crop
production may be mutually reinforcing strategies.

One important constraint may be lack of knowledge about such products, especially their
market potential. Technical assistance, emphasizing market opportunities for different
crops as well as crop management, can be very important. With fresh horticultural
products, local markets can quickly become saturated, causing dramatic price declines. It
is critical for farmers to be aware of the potentials and problems of alternative crops, so
that they can diversify their production. Information on prices in local markets,
announced over radio, could also be helpful.

Such technical assistance need not come only from government extension agents
however. In other parts of the world, farmers often obtain advice from other farmers,
input suppliers or traders. As the input marketing system develops, local suppliers will
become more knowledgeable and able to provide advice to farmers. Providing training to
suppliers as well as farmers could help this process. For some things, however, technical
assistance probably must be provided (or at least financed) by governments, due to
incentives facing private suppliers. For example, integrated pest management and
organic farming methods may not be adequately promoted (relative to their potential
benefit) by private input suppliers, since these methods may reduce their sales of
agrochemicals. Training is also needed on proper use and disposal of pesticides, which
are likely to be much more widely used where horticultural development is occurring.

Another important role for the state in promoting horticultural crop development is to
open up international trade in seeds. The role for research on new varieties may be more
limited than for cereals or other major crops, due to the wide variety and relatively small
amounts produced of any particular horticultural crop.

Where irrigation is used in production of cash crops, conflicts may arise over access to
water and management of irrigation systems. Well functioning institutions are needed to

21

allocate use rights and enforce responsibilities. As with institutions to manage grazing
lands (discussed above), such effective institutions may not arise spontaneously, but may
be catalyzed by appropriate interventions by external agents. Baland and Platteau (1996).
On the other hand, external intervention may undermine the effectiveness of local
management and increase the potential for conflict (ibid.). Thus a careful approach to
promoting development of such institutions is warranted, taking full account of local
conditions and concerns before investing in irrigation schemes or identifying the strategy
to address issues of rights and responsibilities. For example, one microdam was recently
completed by SAERT in Tigray, even though the former users of land flooded by the new
reservoir have not yet been allocated any land in the command area. Such a situation
could cause serious difficulties to the households who have lost land and lead to conflicts
that undermine confidence in the overall effort, which otherwise appears to be achieving
impressive results. In other cases in Tigray, local community councils have been very
involved in such decisions from the outset, and land in the command area has been
allocated to all affected households; resulting in broad support for the effort.

Available input supply and credit to finance input purchases are of course important for
producers of horticultural crops, as they are for high input production of cereals. Given
the high expected returns to such inputs, linking future credit to repayment of past loans
can provide a strong incentive to repay. However, since such crops are highly risky
(particularly price risk), lenders may be reluctant to lend as much as farmers desire where
collateral is limited, as in Ethiopia where land cannot be mortgaged. Where land can be
mortgaged, farmers may be reluctant to borrow due to the risk involved, even if the
expected profits are high. Alternative institutional arrangements, such as sharecropping
and contract farming, can be used as a means of reducing risks and obtaining access to
short term capital.

Tenure insecurity, restrictions on leasing, and land fragmentation may limit
commercialization of perishable cash crops for the same reasons cited earlier in
discussing factors affecting investments in land improvement. These factors are
particularly important with respect to planting fruit trees, which of course require long-
term tenure security, and protection against theft or being cut for fuelwood. Where such
security is lacking, investments in fruit trees are likely to be limited to plots near the
homestead.

Where there is potential for developing processing and/or export, the availability of cold
storage, processing and transport facilities may be critical constraints. The availability of
electricity is one factor that may constrain the development of such facilities. Where
electricity is not available, storage facilities and processors may use diesel generators,
although the costs may be high, especially where fuel taxes are high. Commercial credit
or equity capital also will be needed. Provision of infrastructure and lines of credit for
such purposes and maintaining a policy environment that facilitates private investment
are thus likely to be very important to achieve this potential. Development of processing
can also promote contract farming or cooperatives, since processors will seek to assure
themselves a reliable supply.


22

There is good potential for sustainable land management where horticultural production
is occurring, but there are also risks. Such high-value, labor-intensive production may
reduce pressure on land by providing farmers' sufficient income on a smaller area of
land. It can contribute to agro-biodiversity and help to reduce pest problems if used in
rotations with primary staple crops. Pingali and Rosegrant (1995). Horticultural
production can encourage investment in soil conservation by increasing returns to such
investments. For example, Tiffen et al. (1994) found a strong association between
adoption of horticultural crops and construction of bench terraces in the Machakos
district of Kenya. The cash income generated by horticultural production also provides
incentive and ability to purchase fertilizers, which may restore soil fertility. This effect is
not assured, however, since multiple cropping of horticultural crops can rapidly deplete
soil nutrients even when increased fertilizers are applied. Education and extension efforts
can help to address such problems, though farmers may simply find it too risky or costly
to apply sufficient amounts of fertilizer to avoid this problem. Other potential problems
include contamination of soil and water and human health risks caused by agrochemicals,
and increased conflicts over water. Applied research and extension related to integrated
pest management, integrated nutrient management, and water management are critical to
minimize such risks and attain the greatest possible benefits from this development
strategy.

4.0 HIGH-VALUE NON-PERISHABLE PERENNIAL CROPS

Given the time lags required to receive the benefits of investment, expansion of
production of high-value perennial crops such as coffee and tea where land is scarce
depends upon first assuring food security. Since areas with a comparative advantage in
such non-perishable crops will tend to be further from markets than dairy or horticultural
areas, relying on imported food is likely to be more costly than local production.
Increased food production therefore must be high priority for such areas, with the goal
being elimination of local food deficits and freeing up of scarce land for the production of
higher value crops. The policy and institutional requisites thus include those discussed
earlier to achieve high input intensification of cereal production, including consideration
of subsidies on the transport cost of fertilizer in the near term until food deficits are
eliminated and income from perennial crop production is growing.

Many of the requirements for other commercial strategies mentioned earlier are also
important for high-value perennials. Investment in roads, land tenure security, and land
transactions (to reduce fragmentation) are critical. Research and extension to promote use
of improved varieties and improved management is needed. Some of this can be (and is)
financed by fees on commercial producers; however, there may still be a need for public
sector research and extension to reach small producers using low technology methods,
such as producers of forest coffee in Ethiopia. Promotion of private nurseries (for
example, through availability of credit) can be helpful. Credit to finance inputs and
purchase of tree seedlings can also be helpful. Development of processing facilities and
assuring adequate capacity utilization of such facilities is important, especially for tea
(von Braun et al. 1991). The need to assure a sufficient quantity and reliability of supply
to make such facilities profitable contributed to the attractiveness of large plantations

23

established by colonial settlers in Kenya. Development of alternative institutional
arrangements more appropriate to smallholder production, such as cooperatives or
contract farming, can help to achieve the same goals. Large processing facilities are less
necessary for coffee than tea if coffee is sold in unwashed form, but the value-added in
the local economy is reduced. To be able to tap this potential, substantial investments in
coffee washing facilities are now occurring in coffee producing areas of Ethiopia.
Ethiopian Herald, (May 7, 1998). Maintaining a policy environment conducive to
development of cooperatives and such investments in processing are key to attaining the
potential of this strategy. The benefits of development of high-value perennial crops for
the sustainability of land use can be substantial. As with annual horticultural crops, the
income generated can help reduce pressure to continue producing or expanding onto
marginal lands and allow greater use of inorganic fertilizers, while the increase in land
values encourages investments in land improvements.

In contrast to annual cash crops, high-value perennials are a less erosive land use. Where
coffee is grown in shaded conditions, there is good potential to plant other kinds of trees
for soil fertility management, fodder and/or fruit production, increasing the benefits for
land management and farm incomes. There is evidence from western Kenya that soil
fertility depletion is lower where perennial cash crops such as coffee and tea are grown
than where annual food crops are grown for commercial purposes. De Jager et al. (1998).
As with horticultural crops, however, there are risks posed by increased use of
agrochemicals in the production of such crops. Thus, extension and training will play an
important role in promoting appropriate practices of integrated soil nutrient management
and integrated pest management.

5.0 RURAL NONFARM DEVELOPMENT

In areas close to roads and markets, rural nonfarm activities are usually an important
source of employment and income. Delgado et al. (1994); von Braun et al. (1991). Where
commercial agricultural production is expanding, as in central and parts of western
Kenya, linkages to agricultural input supply, processing, and trading are particularly
important. For example, off-farm income exceeds half of total income for farmers in
western Kenya (the proportion is higher for lower income farmers), and much of this
comes from small enterprises engaged in such agriculturally related activities. Crowley et
al. (1996). Thus many of the requisites for this strategy are the same as those discussed
above for the commercial agricultural development strategies.

Beyond development of commercial agriculture, the key requirements for this strategy
include development of infrastructure (especially roads and electricity) and transportation
facilities, education and vocational training, availability of credit and savings to help
finance small startup enterprises and equity capital for medium and larger enterprises
(access to credit usually not a problem for larger enterprises). It is important to maintain
an environment conducive to investment; for example, by reducing delays in licensing
procedures, facilitating purchase or long-term leasing of land and buildings by enterprises
in urban and peri-urban areas, reducing taxes and broadening the tax base. Restrictions on
labor mobility caused by restrictions on land sales or leasing in rural areas (as in

24

Ethiopia) can also be an important constraint inhibiting migration of workers to areas
where employment demand is high. However, shortages of skilled workers resulting from
low education and inadequate training facilities is probably a more critical constraint.
High priority should be given to improved education in all areas, and to establishing
training facilities where potential for nonfarm development exists.

The impacts of nonfarm development for sustainable land management are less direct
than the effects of the agricultural development strategies, but may be larger and more
profound in the long run. Nonfarm income enables households to save and to overcome
capital market imperfections that may cause households to discount the future heavily
and limit their ability to invest in commercial crop production, inputs or land
improvements. Crowley et al. (1996); Reardon et al. (1996); Pender and Kerr (1998);
Clay et al. 1995). Such development can provide farmers an alternative to continuing
depletion of soil, forests and other resources. Pinstrup-Andersen and Pandya Lorch
(1995). On the other hand, nonfarm development may reduce farmers' incentive to invest
in land improvement, by increasing the opportunity cost of their time. Pender and Kerr
(1998); Clay et al. (1995). It is thus important to promote less labor intensive strategies of
land management such as planting trees rather than annual crops in areas where
nonfarm employment opportunities are increasing the value of labor.

6.0 EMIGRATION

Related to nonfarm development is the strategy of emigration, both seasonal and
permanent. Areas with low agricultural potential and low market access are likely to be
particularly large sources of outmigration, though emigration from all areas of the rural
highlands is likely given the high population density and small farm sizes. The feasibility
of this strategy depends largely upon nonfarm development; thus the requisites of the
strategy include the requisites of nonfarm development. There is also potential for
seasonal rural-rural migration within the highlands from low-potential areas to higher
potential or irrigated areas during the dry season, and in some cases there may be
potential for permanent rural-rural migration to reduce disparities in across locations
(though generally high population density throughout the highlands makes this difficult).

The need for education and training for people in areas of outmigration should be
emphasized. Land tenure is also a key issue affecting migration. People without secure
tenure are unlikely to risk losing their land by taking jobs in the city. The scope for
permanent rural-rural migration is also affected by host area tenure policies affecting
opportunities for land purchasing or leasing. This will be less important with regard to
seasonal migration, although availability of land to establish housing for seasonal
immigrants is important. Education policies also can affect possibilities for inter-regional
migration: for example, different languages are now being taught in different regions of
Ethiopia, which will likely increase barriers to inter-regional migration.





25

7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND HYPOTHESES

In this paper i have argued that the policy and institutional requirements for sustainable
development depend upon the pathway of development that is pursued, and that the
appropriate development pathways depend upon the factors determining potential
comparative advantage especially agricultural potential, access to markets and
population pressure. Several generic development pathways have been identified,
including high external input intensification of food production, low external input
intensification of food production, livestock intensification, commercial production of
perishable (mainly horticultural) crops, commercial production of high-value non-
perishable (mainly perennial) crops, rural nonfarm development, and emigration. We
have argued that success of the commercial agricultural development pathways is largely
conditional upon increased food crop production, particularly in areas with poor market
access with potential for high-value perennial crop production.

Opportunities for intensified commercial production of crop and livestock products are
very good in much of the highlands, where agricultural potential is high. The
opportunities for agricultural development in low-potential areas are more limited,
although there appears to be good potential to increase the overall productivity of land
use through better management of grazing lands and wastelands, particularly in lower
population density areas where substantial areas of such lands are still present. In higher
population density, low- potential areas with good market access, there may be good
potential for investments in irrigation or rural nonfarm development (though rural
nonfarm development may need to depend upon linkages to sectors such as
manufacturing or mining where agricultural potential is low). In high population density,
low-potential areas with poor market access, emigration is bound to be a major element
of people's livelihood strategies. Although many policy prescriptions are valid in general,
consideration of the key constraints likely to be binding in the different situations
discussed suggests a number of hypotheses about where public policy and investment
priorities should be placed:

1. The highest priority for road development should be areas relatively close to urban
markets where there is high agricultural potential or high irrigation potential. The highest
priority for irrigation development is also in these areas; particularly dryer areas,
although supplemental irrigation in higher rainfall areas can also be very valuable. Such
development could enable intensive production of food crops, high-value perishable cash
crops, and dairy products. Where irrigation investment is occurring, adequate attention
must be given to institutional issues, such as how water will be allocated and how losers
will be compensated, prior to physical construction.

2. Where such commercial potential exists, food security is a key to allowing farmers to
exploit the opportunities available. Where farmers have substantial off-farm income, they
may be willing and able to specialize in cash crop production. However, where such
opportunities are more limited (or more limited for income farmers), the risks associated
with cash crop production may require increases in food productivity to enable greater
cash crop production. Increased cash crop production may also help promote increased

26

food crop production (by enabling purchase of inputs), so that both food and cash crop
production may increase for some time before greater specialization occurs. Similar
complementary growth of food crop and dairy production may occur in the early phases
of development. Research and extension programs should recognize and exploit such
complementarities.

3. Assuring adequate provision of inputs and credit, and development of the marketing
system are critical to all commercial strategies. Development of processing facilities and
marketing institutions (such as cooperatives and contract farming), facilitated by a
supportive policy environment, are needed. Research and extension programs will need
to take a broader focus, emphasizing market opportunities for new commodities,
management of animal health, integrated pest management, and integrated soil nutrient
management.

4. Second priority for road development should be high-potential areas further from
markets, especially where population density is high. There is good potential for
intensified production of high-value perennial crops in these areas if roads are adequate.
However, achieving this potential first requires assuring food security, which is likely to
be most economical by increasing productivity in food crop production. For the near
term, subsidies on the cost of transporting fertilizer and other inputs to such areas (if they
are food deficit areas) should be considered as a lower cost alternative to food aid. As
food deficits are eliminated and increased income from perennial crops generated, such
subsidies should be eliminated. More generally, there is a need to increase the availability
and ensure competitive prices of agricultural inputs. A high priority for such areas is also
elimination of land redistributions and avoidance of restrictions on land sales or long
term leasing, so that the problems of land tenure insecurity and land fragmentation can be
reduced.

5. For low-potential areas without good potential for irrigation (especially with lower
population density), priority should be placed on promoting increased productivity of all
land, including grazing lands and wastelands. Cautious efforts are needed by
governments and NGOs to catalyze development of local institutions in order to intensify
management of grazing lands. Contingent upon intensified grazing land management,
some intensification of livestock production is possible. Increased production of small
ruminants may be a particularly profitable strategy. Allocation of wastelands and sloping
lands for private tree planting has potential to substantially reduce the biomass shortage
in some areas, as well as increasing household wealth and incomes, though the potential
for income generation is greater closer to markets. In the near term, food aid may be
needed in such areas, though priority should be given to developing alternative sources of
income as well as increasing land productivity.

6. For low-potential areas with good market access, good opportunities for rural nonfarm
development may exist, though these may depend upon non-agricultural activities, such
as manufacturing and mining, given low agricultural potential. Priority should be on
investment in infrastructure (especially electricity), availability of credit to finance
startup enterprises, and education and training of the labor force.

27


7. For low-potential areas with poor market access (especially with high population
density), emigration should be facilitated. High priority should be placed on education
and training. Allowing land sales or long-term leases could also help to facilitate
emigration and less intensive use of the land.

It is important to emphasize that these are only hypotheses, based upon theoretical
considerations and a very limited amount of empirical evidence. Furthermore, there is
certainly substantial variation within the broad types of situations discussed, and across
households having access to different resource endowments. Addressing problems of
poverty, low agricultural productivity and resource degradation will therefore require
strategies that address the needs of the poor as well as the more well-endowed.
Nevertheless, identifying the broad strategies of development that are feasible can help to
identify and recommend targeted strategies for specific situations. Making
recommendations about specific strategies will require more detailed information about
the costs and benefits of alternative strategies in different situations, the priorities and
concerns of key stakeholders, and other factors that will determine the likely success or
failure of such recommendations. Policy research is needed to address these issues. We
hope that this paper will help to provide impetus and guidance to such research.


28

8.0 REFERENCES

Binswanger, H.P., and J. McIntire. 1987. Behavioral and material determinants of
production relations in land-abundant tropical agriculture. Economic Development and
Cultural Change 36 (1): 73-99.

Bojo, J., and D. Cassells. 1995. Land degradation and rehabilitation in Ethiopia: A
reassessment. AFTES Working Paper No. 17. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Boserup, E. 1965. The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian
change under population pressure. New York: Aldine Publishers.

Braun, A.R., E.M.A. Smaling, E.I. Muchugu, K.D. Shepherd, and J.D. Corbett. 1997.
Maintenance and improvement of soil productivity in the highlands of Ethiopia, Kenya,
Madagascar and Uganda. AHI Technical Report Series No. 6, African Highlands
Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya.

Bumb, B.L., and C.A. Baanante. 1996. The role of fertilizer in sustaining food security
and protecting the environment to 2020. Food, Agriculture and the Environment
Discussion Paper 17. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.

Clay, D., F. Byiringiro, J. Kangasniemi, T. Reardon, B. Sibomana, and L. Uwamariya.
1995. Promoting food security in Rwanda through sustainable agricultural productivity:
Meeting the challenges of population pressure, land degradation, and poverty.
Department of Agricultural Economics Staff Paper No. 95-08, Michigan State University.

Cleaver, K.M., and G.A. Schrieber. 1994. Reversing the spiral: The population,
agriculture and environment nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa. Washington, D.C.: World
Bank.

Cooper, P.J.M., R.R.B. Leakey, M.R. Rao, and L. Reynolds. 1996. Agroforestry and the
mitigation of land degradation in the humid and sub-humid tropics of Africa.
Experimental Agriculture 32: 235-290.

Crowley, E.L., M.J. Soule, and S.E. Carter. 1996. Off-farm income and farming in
western Kenya. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry and Tropical Soils
Biology and Fertility Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. Mimeo.

de Jager, A., I. Kariuki, F.M. Matiri, M. Odendo, and J.M. Wanyama. 1998. Monitoring
nutrient flows and economic performance in African farming systems (NUTMON). IV.
Linking nutrient balances and economic performance in three districts in Kenya. Nutrient
balances as indicators of productivity and sustainability in Sub-Saharan African
agriculture, ed. E.M.A. Smaling. Special Issue of Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
71: 81-92.


29

Delgado, C. 1995. Africa's changing agricultural development strategies: Past and
present paradigms as a guide to the future. Food, Agriculture, and the Environment
Discussion Paper 3. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.

Delgado, C.L., J.C. Hopkins, and V.A. Kelly. 1994. Agricultural growth linkages in Sub-
Saharan Africa. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C. Mimeo.

Ehui, S.K., B.T. Kang, and D.S.C. Spencer. 1990. Economic analysis of soil erosion
effects in alley cropping, no-till and bush fallow systems in south western Nigeria.
Agricultural Systems 34: 349-368.

Freeman, H.A., S.K. Ehui, and E.N. Betubiza. 1998a. Supply of institutional credit for
smallholder livestock producers in Uganda, Ethiopia and Nigeria. In The role of credit in
the uptake of improved dairy technology in Sub-Saharan Africa, ed. H.A. Freeman, M.A.
Jabbar, and S.K. Ehui. Socioeconomics and Policy Research Working Paper No. 21,
International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa. Forthcoming.

Freeman, H.A., S.K. Ehui, and M.A. Jabbar. 1998b. Credit constraints and smallholder
dairy production in the East African highlands: application of a switching regression
model. Agricultural Economics. Forthcoming.

Gezahegn A., and F. Heidhues. 1998. Analysis of innovation, dissemination and adoption
of vertisol technology: Some evidence from the highlands of Ethiopia. Paper presented at
the Soil Fertility Management Workshop, Addis Ababa, April 21-23.

Hayami, Y., and V.W. Ruttan. 1985. Agricultural development: An international
perspective, 2 nd ed. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Hoekstra, D. A. 1988. Summary of zonal agroforestry potentials and research across land
use systems in the highlands of Eastern and Central Africa. No. 15. Agroforestry
Research Network for Africa. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.

Hoekstra, D., and J.D. Corbett. 1995. Sustainable agricultural growth for the highlands of
East and Central Africa: Prospects to 2020. International Food Policy Research Institute,
Washington, D.C. Mimeo.

International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). 1995. A 2020 vision for food,
agriculture, and the environment: The vision, challenge, and recommended action.
Washington, D.C.: IFPRI.

Jahnke, H.E. 1982. Livestock production systems and livestock development in tropical
Africa. Kiel, Germany: Kieler Wissenschaftsverlag Vaug.

McIntire, J., D. Bourzat, and P. Pingali. 1992. Crop-livestock interaction in Sub-Saharan
Africa. World Bank, Washington, D.C.

30

Minae, S., and D. Nyamai. 1988. Agroforestry research project proposal for the coffee
based system in the bimodal highlands, central and eastern provinces, Kenya. AFRENA
Report No. 16. Nairobi, International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.

Mwangi, J.G. 1999. Policy milestones in Kenya that have supported or constrained
sustainable agriculture and poverty alleviation. Tegemeo Institute of Egerton University,
Kenya. Mimeo.

Nyoro, J., and H. Muiruri. 1999. Sustainable agriculturally-based rural livelihoods: Mwea
study site. Tegemeo Institute of Egerton University, Kenya. Mimeo.

Olson, J.M. 1995. Natural resource management by farmers in Kabale District, Uganda.
International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya. Mimeo.

Palm, C.A., R.J.K. Myers, and S.M. Nandwa. 1997. Combined use of organic and
inorganic nutrient sources for soil fertility maintenance and replenishment. In
Replenishing soil fertility in Africa, ed. R.J. Buresh, P.A. Sanchez, and F. Calhoun.
Madison, Wisc.: Soil Science Society of America, Inc. and American Society of
Agronomy, Inc.

Pender, J.L. and J.M. Kerr. 1998. Determinants of farmers' indigenous soil and water
conservation practices in semi-arid India. Agricultural Economics 19: 113-125.

Pingali, P.L. and M.W. Rosegrant. 1995. Agricultural commercialization and
diversification: processes and policies. Food Policy 20 (3): 171-185.

Pinstrup-Andersen, P., and R. Pandya-Lorch. 1995. Alleviating poverty, intensifying
agriculture, and effectively managing natural resources. Food, Agriculture and
Environment Discussion Paper 1. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research
Institute.

Place, F., and P. Hazell. 1993. Productivity effects of indigenous land tenure systems in
Sub-Saharan Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75: 10-19.

Place, F., and K. Otsuka. 1997. Population pressure, land tenure, and tree resource
management in Uganda. EPTD Discussion Paper No. 24. Washington, D.C., International
Food Policy Research Institute.

Place, F., and S.E. Migot-Adholla. 1998. Land registration and smallholder farms in
Kenya. Land Economics 74 (3): 360-373.

Quinones, M.A., N.E. Borlaug, and C.R. Dowswell. 1997. A fertilizer-based green
revolution for Africa. In Replenishing soil fertility in Africa, ed. R.J. Buresh, P.A.
Sanchez, and F. Calhoun. Madison, Wisc.: Soil Science Society of America, Inc. and
American Society of Agronomy, Inc.


31

Ruthenberg, H. 1980. Farming systems in the tropics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sanchez, P.A., K.D. Shepherd, M.J. Soule, F.M. Place, R.J. Buresh, A.N. Izac, A.U.

Staal, S., C.L. Delgado, and C.F. Nicholson. 1997. Smallholder dairying under
transactions costs in East Africa. World Development 25: 779-794.

Staal, S.J. and B.I. Shapiro. 1994. The effects of recent price liberalization on Kenyan
peri-urban dairy: A case study using the policy analysis matrix approach. Food Policy 19
(6): 533-549.

Tiffen, M., M. Mortimore, and F. Gichuki. 1994. More people, less erosion:
Environmental recovery in Kenya. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

von Braun, J., H. de Haen, and J. Blanken. 1991. Commercialization of agriculture under
population pressure: Effects on production, consumption, and nutrition in Rwanda.
Research Report 85. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute.

Winrock International. 1992. Assessment of animal agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Morrilton, Ark.: Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development.

World Bank. 1994. Adjustment in Africa: Reforms, results, and the road ahead. World
Bank Policy Research Report. New York: Oxford University Press.

World Bank. 1996. Uganda: the challenge of growth and poverty reduction. Country
Study. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

World Report, Ltd. 1998. World report on Ethiopia. March.



32

 
dd
Home | Spanish | Portugese | Chinese | French | Online Courses | Available Courses | View Course Demo | Career Center | Available Positions | Ask Career Coach | The Job Interview | Writing Resume | Accreditation | Areas of Study | Bachelor Degree Programs | Masters Degree Programs | Doctoral Degree Programs | Course and Curriculum | Human Rights | Online Library | Links Exchange | 54 Million Records | Press Room | New Look | Representations | Student Publications | Share with Us | Alumni | Graduates | Sponsors | General Information | Mission & Vision | School of Business and Economics | School of Science and Engineering | School of Social and Human Studies | Download Center | Admission Requirements | Tuition | Apply Online | Faculty & Staff | Distance Learning Overview | Student Testimonials | Frequently Asked Questions | Distance Learning Request Information | Register for Program | Admission Application Form

Copyright ® 1979 - 2006, 2008 Atlantic International University . All rights reserved.
Google
"