Tarek Laroussi Doctor of Philosop hy Legal Studies Algeria |
José Antonio da Costa Bachelor of Information Technology Information Systems Engineering Angola |
Kavya Saxena Doctor of Science Biology Australia |
Hermann Bado Doctor of Philosop hy Marketing Burkina Faso |
Kahisha Alidor Munemeka Doctor of Legal Studies Legal Studies Congo (DRC ) |
Hector Augusto Rodriguez Bachelor of Political Science Political Science Dominican Republic |
Lucia Placencia Jaya Bachelor of Coa ching Psychology Ecuador |
Carmita Dayci Gracia Santana Bachelor of Engineering Business Administration Engineering Ecuador |
Jose Miguel Lopez Vasquez Bachelor of Logistics Logistics Engineering El Salvador |
Eulalia Francisca Tela Miaga Obiang Bachelor of Business Administration Banking and Finance Equatorial Guinea |
Priscila Nena Panades Master of Education Educational and Organizational Leadership Equatorial Guinea |
Beniam Tilahun Jenber Doctor of Project Management Development Projects Management Ethiop ia |
Abraham Demissie Chare Doctor of International Business International Business Ethiop ia |
Milena Rampoldi Doctor of Philosop hy Sociology Finland |
Thimotee Leon Coly Doctor of Education Education Gabo n |
Bukari Zakari Doctor of Health Economics Health Policy and Financing Ghana |
Evalyne Nthoki Nzuve Bachelor of Psychology Organizational Psychology Ghana |
Alejandro Gudberto Camas Chávez Doctor of Education Education Guatemala |
Conde Mamoudou Doctor of Business Administration Banking and Finance Guinea |
Flor Elizabeth Meza Melgar Bachelor of Science Biochemistry and Health Science Honduras |
Johnny Kadunsin Ruangmei Doctor of Science Computer Science India |
Shaymaa Ahmed Zaidan Doctor of Science Biology Iraq |
Patricia Wilson Bachelor of Science CPR, Nutrition and Diet and Behavior Mod. Jamaica |
Gary Anthony Mckenzie Doctor of Science Psychology Jamaica |
William Sagini Oribu Post-Doctorate of Management Operations Management Kenya |
Agnes Wavinya Nzioka Doctor of Science Public Health Kenya |
Sidy Diarra Doctor of Science Telecommunications Engineering Mali |
Praveen Obeegadoo Doctor of Philosop hy Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism Mauritius |
Javier Alberto Sierra Post-Doctorate of Business Administration Business Administration Mexico |
Murray Orji Doctor of Management Management Nigeria |
Freda Isioma Nwaulune Doctor of Philosop hy Psychology Nigeria |
Chinenye Keren Uche Onyejike Master of Science Interior Design Nigeria |
Robert Kout Lee Dowi Master of Science Public and Community Health Pap ua New Guinea |
Jordan Jair Baldeon Alcedo Bachelor of Finance Finance Peru |
Cordelia Clara Adeline Pratt Master of Arts Human Resource Management Sierra Leone |
Amir Singh Post-Doctorate of Psychology Positive Psychology Singapo re |
Vusi Clement Nkuna Doctor of Philosop hy Criminal Justice Administration South Africa |
David Gordon Misaka Bachelor of Health Science Public Health and Epidemiology South Sudan |
Frida Mwendwa Nkonge Bachelor of Science Legal Studies South Sudan |
Nilsa Gricelda Giménez González Bachelor of Science Psychopedagogy Spa in |
Ebrima Williams Bachelor of Arts Leadership The Gambia |
Sybris Abiola Harvey Doctor of Science Clinical Psychology Trinidad & Toba go |
Ali Mohammadi Doctor of Philosop hy Clinical Psychology Türkiye |
Achulo Osara Florence Doctor of Clinical Psychology Traumatology and Family Counseling Uganda |
Natacha Paola Richieri Balsiger Bachelor of Science Psychology Uruguay |
Abdou Diouf Baranyizigiye Bachelor of Business Administration Business Administration USA |
Mohammed Odunowo Doctor of Transpo rtation Management Airport Operation Management USA |
Milka Gronlund Post-Doctorate of Arts Dance and Movement Therapy USA |
Hudu Mohammed Doctor of Science Electrical Engineering USA |
Demetria Piedad Mba Elomba Master of Business Administration Business Administration USA |
Miriam E. Ponce López de Huasco Master of Science Psychology USA |
Bobby Ewart Hamilton Doctor of Business Administration Business Administration USA |
Eric Kamanzi Master of Project Management Engineering and Global Sustainability USA |
Wondimagegn Tadesse Tagegn Doctor of Art Public Finance USA |
Patricia Lynn Moore Armstrong Doctor of Philosop hy Theology USA |
Carmen Nineth Samudio Rodríguez Doctor of Science Food Science and Nutrition USA |
Mapanza Hakanyinza Nkwilimba Doctor of Management Leadership and Management Zambia |
|||
The 2024 Nobel Prize in
Economics was awarded to
Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson
and James A. Robinson for
their work on Nogales divided
by a border between Mexico
and the United States. What
they demonstrated was that
institutions are the generators
of prosperity. The wealth of
nations depends on the institutions
that exist.
The winners have been
working in Political Economy
for some time. Political
Economy aims to study the
origin and development of the
wealth of nations based on
their institutions.
Previous works to the
award-winning work are: Why
Countries Fail -2014, The Narrow
Corridor -2019 and Power
and Progress, our millennial
struggle for technology and
Prosperity -2023.
These investigations open
the space to question what the winners consider when
they say that the institutions that are created create wealth;
here comes what the rulers
do and in what conditions of
participation the citizens are.
We are living in a world where
we don’t know where we are
going elections of governments
everywhere and populist rulers
on the rise: these two events
governed by hate speech and
misinformation.
What can we expect? What can we do? The first thing is
to have a calm head to be able
to analyze events and place
ourselves in a space where we
can live in peace.
Hate speech and misinformation
reach their point
of dominance in many human
beings when emotions
are brought to the maximum
point. The purpose of those
who promote this type of information is, precisely, to
take people to that maximum
point so that reason diminishes
and thus obtain the ends that
would not be achieved through
analysis and reasoning.
UNESCO tells us that: “Hate
speech is spread for a variety of
reasons, including to deliberately
attempt to polarize,
divide, antagonize or frighten
the population or members of
specific target groups”. UNESCO
-Combating hate speec h throu gh
educ ation : A guide for policymakers.
UNESCO 2024, p. 19. https://unesdoc.
unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000390977
The award winners place
great importance on citizen
participation, so we should ask
ourselves what will come of all
the elections we have witnessed
that have been based on
idle talk and disinformation.
What will come of the countries
where we have seen hate
speech and disinformation at their highest level?
Populist governments that
rely on this type of discourse
and disinformation benefit
only their group and the bulk
of the population is told that
they will give them this and
that benefit.
What happens is that the
bulk of the population is kept
in the belief that they must
comply with these and the
other requirements and so, in
the end, they are given nothing;
they continue with the
same instruments that brought
them to power.
UNESCO says that disinformation
is: “Disinformation:
false information that is deliberately
spread to cause harm or
intentionally transmit misinformation.
The uninformed
public may continue to spread
messages with false content
without meaning to”. UNESCO -
Combating hate speec h throu gh educ ation
: a guide for policymakers. UNESCO
2024, p. 18. https://unesdoc.unesco.
org/ark:/48223/pf000039097
Disinformation has precise
objectives: to obtain power at
any cost. The question is. What
will the used ones do when
time passes, and they realize
that they were deceived?
Hence the importance that
Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson
give to nations to achieve
their development. “The massive
growth of paid political
disinformation —driven by powerful and consolidated political
fronts in different countries
of the world that have
used and spread hate speech
and dehumanizing images with
the aim of obtaining political
gain or votes— has been a factor
of utmost importance for
the increase in hate speech”.
UNESCO - Combating hate speec h
throu gh educ ation : a guide for policy
makers. UNESCO 2024, p. 30. https://
unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/
pf0000390977
There is a problem to identify
with the power achieved
through hate speech and disinformation:
for society to obtain
better jobs, it needs education,
and this is beginning to
be changed in its Study Plans
and Programs for the benefit
of the system, so it will not
advance, and it will take time.
Hate speech towards groups
that don’t benefit them is also
usually included. Disciplines
that offer development of
rational or moral thought are
also removed.
We have an element to consider
in development: Artificial
Intelligence. It is considered
that using it is already enough
to achieve everything, and it
is forgotten that more study is
required to apply it.
According to The International
Monetary Fund: “All this techno-
optimism is inspired by the
“productivity spillover effect”:
the deep-rooted belief that technological change —including
automation— generates
an increase in productivity,
which in turn raises net wages
and leads to shared prosperity”.
Internation al Mone tary Fun d.
Rebalanc ing Artificial Intelligence .
Dece mber 2023. https://www.imf.org/
es/Publications/fandd/issues/2023/12/
Rebalancing-AI-Acemoglu-Johnson
Hence the UNESCO study to
generate elements that clearly
identify hate speech and misinformation
due to the consequences
they generate.
That is why UNESCO in its
proposal to combat hate speech
tells us: “The educational approach to counteract hate
speech requires focusing on
social and emotional learning
(SEL) so that students can
recognize their strengths and
develop their skills with the
aim of controlling stress and
negative emotions, solving
problems effectively and thus
improving self-confidence,
self-efficacy and assertiveness”.
UNESCO- Combating hate
speec h throu gh educ ation : a guide for
policy makers. UNESCO 2024, p. 37.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/
pf0000390977
Faced with totalitarianism
and populism at their most extreme, it seems that 2025
will be a somewhat hectic year.
The goals that both groups set
for themselves by wanting to
annual freedoms and turn the
world into a group of workers
and others with all the power
for enrichment seem to make
the outlook somewhat bleak.
About this situation, Acemoglu
and Johnson say the
following: “Is there no remedy
against these disastrous ideas
that are imposed on people
without their consent? Is there
no barrier against the social
bias of technology? Are we
trapped in an endless cycle in which one arrogant vision
gives way to the next
while shaping our future and
ignoring the possible damage?
No. There is hope, because
History has also taught us that
there can be a more inclusive
approach, which listens
to a broader set of voices and
recognizes the negative consequences
on the rest of the
population.” Ace moglu. and Simon
Johnson . 2023, p. 40.
The best thing to do is to
stay calm and watch the events
that are happening, and those
who have power through hate
speech and misinformation
don’t want the other who
thinks and took power like
them to eat the biggest part of
the cake; surely there will be problems between them.
They talk a lot about technology
and Artificial Intelligence,
but it is to use it to
their advantage, that is why
Acemoglu and Johnson say:
“The good news —or the bad
news, depending on how you
look at it— is that the concrete
way of applying knowledge and
scientific advances depends
on our perspective, on how
human beings can transform
knowledge into techniques
and methods aimed at solving
specific problems.” Ace moglu.
and Simon Johnson . 2023, p. 35.
We must live in this world,
but without being victims of
hate speech or misinformation.
The bad thing about the situation
is that hate speech goes hand in hand with misinformation,
so it is better to be
informed and not to be looking
for what this or that person
said if we already know the
path they are taking.
Most likely, the above factors
will diminish when people stop
looking for what others say.
The purpose of saying
outrageous things is to attract
attention so that they will continue
to follow them because,
according to them, something
must stick.
We already know that when
emotions are carried to the
maximum, people end up
fleeing the situation out of
exhaustion.
That is why Acemoglu and
Johnson say: “The really bad
news is that, even in the best
moments of History, the vision
of people with power exerts a
disproportionate effect on the
concrete use of the tools we
have at our disposal and on the
direction that innovation takes.
That is, the effects of technology
coincide with their beliefs
and interests and have often
been proven to have a very
high cost for the rest of the
population. The good news is
that decisions and perspectives
can change”. Ace moglu. and Simon
Johnson . 2023, p. 35.
According to the researchers
awarded the Nobel Prize in
Economics 2024, the situation
generated by totalitarianism and populism will have a cost
for the universal population;
we will see those costs that will
also affect them because they
are also part of the population.
These moments in History
have always been a learning
experience for all human beings.
The learning situation is
very important, so whatever
may happen, what we must do
is continue studying.
The situation that technology
will leave many unemployed
is part of a fallacious
discourse: all jobs are
not done through advanced
technology or Artificial Intelligence.
The upper spheres
of production are, but that
demands greater production
from the lower spheres
of production. We will not
have robots everywhere and
human beings sitting around.
International Monetary Fund.
Rebalancing AI. Dece mber 2023.
https://www.imf.org/es/Publications/
fandd/issues/2023/12/Rebalancing- AI-Acemoglu-Johnson Acemoglu and
Simon Johnson. Power and Progress,
our millennial fight for technology
and Prosperity. 2023.
Depending on what area of
production you want to be in is
what you have to do with your
studies. You are student at Atlantic
International University
(AIU). Study; prepare yourself
for the world that, as the Nobel
Prize winners 2024 —Acemoglu,
Johnson and Robinson—
say, is under construction.
It is up to you where
you want to be. Study
because you will have
a more fulfilling life
because knowledge will
free you from the anguish
of misinformation
and hate speech.
Study and finish your
program because knowledge,
in addition to providing
the means for life,
also gives peace.
BIBLIOGRAPHY. Acemoglu. A y Simon Johnson. Poder y Progreso,
nuestra lucha milenaria por la tecnología y la Prosperidad. España,
Ediciones Deusto, 2023 | Fondo Monetario Internacional.
Reequilibrar la Inteligencia Artificial. Diciembre 2023.
https://www.imf.org/es/Publications/fandd/issues/2023/12/
Rebalancing-AI-Acemoglu-Johnson | UNAM -Nobel de Economía
2024: el papel clave de las instituciones en la prosperidad
https://unamglobal.unam.mx/global_revista/nobel-de-economia-2024-elpapel-
clave-de-las-instituciones-en-la-prosperidad/ | UNESCO -Combatir
el discurso de odio a través de la educación: una guía para los
responsables de la formulación de políticas. UNESCO 2024. https://
unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000390977
The concept of intelligence in
the context of information
The concept of intelligence
refers to the collection, analysis
and use of key information
for strategic decisionmaking,
particularly in areas
such as security, defense and
the private sector. Although it is commonly associated with
espionage, intelligence is much
more complex. It is a process
that involves obtaining secret
information and processing it
to support decision-making in
situations of uncertainty. Over
time, different authors have
defined intelligence in different ways, addressing its relationship
with decision-making and
data analysis.
Definitions of intelligence
Sherman Kent in 1949, in his
work Strategic Intelligence for
American World Policy, addresses
the term ‘information’ as a synonym for knowledge. For
Kent, intelligence refers to the
collection of high-level data,
especially on foreign affairs.
Michael Warner (2002)
expands on this definition,
suggesting that intelligence
goes beyond simple information
gathering; it primarily
involves obtaining secret
information. Secrecy is seen
by Warner as the most crucial
component within the intelligence
process.
Mark Lowenthal (2011) argues
that analysis is the fundamental
piece of intelligence. Analysis
provides policy makers with
assessments that allow for
informed decisions, although
analysis sometimes does not
anticipate all the consequences
of decisions.
Karl von Clausewitz, in “Vom
Kriege” (1832), points out that
war involves high uncertainty,
and therefore, deep intelligence
is essential to discern the truth
amidst this uncertainty.
Jennifer Sims (2019) discusses
international cooperation in
intelligence, called ‘linkage’, as
a way to improve information
gathering, reduce risks and
costs, and optimize the speed
with which data is processed.
Richard J. Heuer (1999)
reinforces the idea that intelligence
depends on interaction
with various sources to obtain
a more complete view of the
situation, beyond the automated
information provided by
machines.
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Artificial intelligence is an
interdisciplinary field that
combines computer science
and engineering with the aim
of developing systems capable
of performing tasks that
require human intelligence,
such as reasoning, learning,
natural language understanding,
visual perception, and
decision making.
John McCarthy (2007), in his
definition of AI, points out that
this discipline seeks to develop
intelligent machines, which
do not necessarily imitate the
human brain, but rather solve
complex problems using computational
methods.
Although computer systems do not have an Intelligence
Quotient (IQ) like human
beings, the concept of IQ is related
to the early development
of intelligence in children,
calculating the relationship
between age and cognitive
abilities. AI, on the other hand,
is not limited by these parameters
and focuses on creating
machines that can perform
tasks efficiently.
CIQ vs. Artificial Intelligence
Although AI may not have
an IQ, several thinkers such
as Alan Turing (1950) proposed
that computer programs
should imitate the mind of a
child, since the education process
is similar to that of human
beings. Turing suggested that
by progressively teaching a
machine, it could achieve adult
capabilities.
On the other hand, Stuart
Russell and Peter Norvig (1995)
argue that AI seeks not only to
understand how humans think,
but also to create machines
that are intelligent in their
own right, reaching a level of
superintelligence.
In this sense, AI models
based on neural network
theory have been proposed,
such as deep learning models,
which allow machines to learn
autonomously from large volumes
of data. However, these
models are often described as
‘black boxes’ due to their lack
of transparency in the process
that leads to their results.
Black boxes in Artificial
Intelligence
The concept of black boxes
refers to complex systems
whose internal workings are
difficult to understand, even
though the inputs and outputs
of the system can be known.
In the case of AI systems,
especially those using deep
learning, although the results
obtained are accurate, the
process by which machines
arrive at those conclusions can
be opaque.
Nicholas Diakopoulos (2014)
argues that, although algorithms
are black boxes, reverse
engineering can allow us to
understand their inputs and
outputs, and therefore their
internal processes.
Arthur Holland Michel
(2020) also observes that, in
computer science, black boxes
are systems whose transformation
of inputs into outputs
is unknown, although the system
itself can be very accurate.
The future of Artificial
Intelligence
There are two opposing
views on the future of AI: an
optimistic one and a pessimistic
one. In the optimistic
view, AI could benefit humanity
by helping solve complex
problems and improving the
have the ability to learn continuously
and manage uncertainty.
This type of intelligence
could radically change the way
humans live, work, and relate
to each other.
Being is just a state of mind
One of the big philosophical
and ethical questions raised by
AI is whether a machine can
‘be’ in the sense that humans
are. If we consider that ‘being’
implies having consciousness
and emotions, then the debate
arises as to whether an AI,
however advanced, can achieve
a form of self-awareness similar
to that of a human. This
quality of life. However, in the
pessimistic view, AI could pose
a risk if used inappropriately
or if it evolves into intelligence
beyond human control.
Eliezer Yudkowsky (2008)
warns about the potential risks
of AI, suggesting that an AI
programmed to implement a
specific political system, such
as communism or liberalism,
could become a threat if not
properly controlled.
Ray Kurzweil’s (2005)
view, on the other hand, is
more optimistic. According
to Kurzweil, the Singularity
is a time in the future where
technological advancement will
reach such a speed that it will
profoundly transform human
life, including institutions,
the economy, and the perception
of death. In this scenario,
the integration of biology
and technology would allow
humans to transcend their biological
condition, which would
mean that people would have
the ability to decide how many
years they live.
Towards the Singularity
The idea of the Singularity
refers to the point at which
machines reach such advanced
intelligence that they surpass
the human ability to understand
or control them. Nick
Bostrom (2014) points out that
for an AI system to achieve
general intelligence, it must
raises philosophical questions
about the nature of being and
whether machines can have a
subjective experience of reality.
Intelligence, both human
and artificial, continues to
be a complex and expanding
field. As technology advances,
new opportunities and risks
arise associated with creating
machines that mimic or even
surpass human intelligence.
The future of AI poses great
unknowns, but it also offers
the possibility of radically
transforming our lives, our
institutions, and our relationship
with technology.
Dr. Franklin Valcin Presi den t/Academic Dean |
Dr. José Mercado Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board of Trustees |
Ricardo González, PhD Provost |
Dr. Ricardo Gonzalez Chief Operation Officer and MKT Director |
Linda Collazo Logistics Coordinator |
AIU Tutors Coordinators: Deborah Rodriguez Amiakhor Ejaeta Amanda Gutierrez William Mora Miriam James Admissions Coordinators: Amalia Aldrett Sandra Garcia Junko Shimizu Veronica Amuz Alba Ochoa Jenis Garcia Judith Brown Chris Soto René Cordón Dr. Anderas Rissler Academic Coordinators: Dr. Adesida Oluwafemi Dr. Emmanuel Gbagu Dr. Lucia Gorea Dr. Edgar Colon Dr. Mario Rios Freddy Frejus Dr. Nilani Ljunggren De Silva Dr. Scott Wilson Dr. Mohammad Shaidul Islam |
Dr. Miriam Garibaldi Vice provost for Research |
Carolina Valdes Human Resource Coordinator |
|
Dr. Ofelia Miller Director of AIU |
Carlos Aponte Teleco mmunications Coordinator |
|
Clara Margalef Director of Special Projects of AIU |
David Jung Corporate/Legal Counsel |
|
Juan Pablo Moreno Director of Operations |
Bruce Kim Advisor/Consultant |
|
Paula Viera Director of Intelligence Systems |
Thomas Kim Corporate/ Accounting Counsel |
|
Felipe Gomez Design Director / IT Supervisor |
Maricela Esparza Administrative Coordinator |
|
Kevin Moll Web Designer |
Chris Benjamin IT and Hosting Support |
|
Daritza Ysla IT Coordinator |
Maria Pastrana Accounting Coordinator |
|
Daritza Ysla IT Coordinator |
Roberto Aldrett Communications Coordinator |
|
Nadeem Awan Chief Programming Officer |
Giovanni Castillo IT Support |
|
Dr. Edward Lambert Academic Director |
Antonella Fonseca Quality Control & Data Analysis |
|
Dr. Ariadna Romero Advisor Coordinator |
Adrián Varela Graphic Design |
|
Jhanzaib Awan Senior Programmer |
Vanesa D’Angelo Content Writer |
|
Leonardo Salas Human Resource Manager |
Jaime Rotlewicz Dean of Admissions |
|
Benjamin Joseph IT and Technology Support |
Michael Phillips Registrar’s Office |
|
Rosie Perez Finance Coordinator |
||