Ivany Neto Carlos Bachelor of Business and Economics Accounting Angola |
Moya Modise Doctor of Education Curriculum and Evaluation Botswana |
Bambara Thibaut Master of Science Public Health Burundi |
Khy Phearun Doctor of Philosop hy Educational Technology Cambodia |
Nanfa Simon Doctor of Science Health Care Management Cameroon |
Israr Waheed Doctor of Philosop hy Maritime Management Canada |
Kieran Oliver Finch Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering Cayman Islands |
Hector Erazo Ospina Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering Colombia |
Julio C. Reyes Hiraldo Bachelor of Project Management Development of New Projects Dominican Republic |
Paul Antonio Anchundia Bastidas Doctor of Philosop hy Org. Agri.: Plant Oxo-Hydrothermal Reg. Ecuador |
Cindy Yajaira Rodriguez de Rivas Bachelor of Science Nutrition and Dietetics El Salvador |
Edith Flore Djoumele Bachelor of Education Educative Administration and Supervision Equatorial Guinea |
Mark Obeng Andoh Doctor of Theology Theology Ghana |
Kwame Osei-Bonsu Master of Accounting International Taxation Ghana |
Ida Adjoa Asiedu Bachelor of Science Business Communication Ghana |
Pedro Luis Tavarez Maria Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering Italy |
Saul Davis Sango Master of Psychology Industrial and Organizational Psychology Kenya |
Nathan Nyamao Bachelor of Science Mechanical Engineering Kenya |
Philip Kamau Manyara Bachelor of Science Business Information Technology Kenya |
Daniel Sandoval Ocampo Doctor of Science Nutrition Mexico |
Odete Moises Cossa Doctor of Science Public Health Mozambique |
Juan Jose Montoya Perez Master of Legal Studies Criminal and Civil Legal Studies Nicaragua |
Adenekan Aminat Omonike Bachelor of Science Food Science Nigeria |
Oluwole Muyiwa Smile Doctor of Healthcare Administration Health Economics Nigeria |
Ahmed Gimba Bello Doctor of Science Economics Nigeria |
Simon Urakowi Ugi Doctor of Philosop hy Educational Leadership Pap ua New Guinea |
Claude Phiri Bachelor of Science Accounting and Financial Management South Africa |
Marius Florin Vlad Doctor of Education Education Spain |
Guven Icoz Graduate with Distinction Doctor of Science Security and Strategic Studies Türkiye |
Wilfred Opio Wanyama Doctor of Business Administration Marketing Uganda |
Dr. Zelda Hill Doctor of Philosop hy Music Education United Kingdom |
Babatunde Olusakin Olorunfemi Doctor of Business Administration Business Management United Kingdom |
Abdulganiyu Olayiwola Salako Doctor of Philosop hy Geomechanics USA |
Sarah J. Loudy Doctor of Philosop hy Sport Science and Nutrition USA |
When talking about benefits,
many immediately
think of the economic aspect.
The benefit of something is not
only an economic aspect, it’s
also a quality of life aspect.
Quality of life refers to having
the opportunity to grow as
a human being, receiving the
benefits corresponding to Human
Rights from the State.
As for learning, it’s being
able to identify an object, which
can be physical or ideal, and the
characteristics it has. Learning can be informal and
formal. Informal learning
is what we obtain through the
experience we acquire in living
with others. Formal learning
is what science provides
us. For formal learning we
need to be guided in the methods
that science must achieve
knowledge of objects.
In formal learning we currently
have serious problems
because the States, which
oversee organizing education,
in many cases, change the social
sciences for ideologies that
suit their interests to remain
in power. We also have the
problem that many citizens are
made to think that education,
learning, is beneficial for a few.
Another difficulty is the
implementation that the States
do so that all citizens can have
quality education.
We know that there are
Psychological and Pedagogical
methods so that students
can achieve the knowledge that
today’s society demands.
The implementation and
training of knowledge accompaniers
is something that many
States don’t do because they
save the money for other activities
that suit their interests.
Human Rights are rights of
all human beings and due to
their ignorance, many people
are used for the benefit of certain
rulers.
There are 30 Human Rights
and States are obliged to provide
them to all beings in the
society they represent.
The State is not for the
benefit of certain groups. “…
it is said that the State, as a
human work, has been built to
serve social, that is, collective,
purposes of all the members
of a society…” National Autonomous
University of Mexico- UNAM . Legal
Archives- p. 46-47. https://archivos.
juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/
3/1461/5.pdf
The State arises to organize
everyone in a coexistence of
opportunities for all. In the
times in which we live, groups
of human beings have appropriated
the functions of the
State to only look after their
economic well-being.
Education and Quality
Education is a Right for every
human being. From the legal point of view “...it is stated
that the State is a legal person
formed by a political community,
settled in a determined
territory and sovereignly organized
in its own government
with decision and action.”
National Autonomous University of Mexico-
UNAM . Legal Archives- p. 46 https://
archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/
libros/3/1461/5.pdf
The State is not an entity
that emerged from the taste of
anyone: it means the coexistence
and organization of
human beings and the opportunity
to be had and treated
with all the benefits and rights
as a human being.
“Education is a human
right. The right to education
is enshrined in article 26 of
the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights. The declaration
calls for free primary education
and mandatory. The Convention
on the Rights of the Child,
adopted in 1989, goes further
by stipulating that countries
must make higher education
accessible to all.” United Nations. International Education Day. january 24.
https://www.un.org/es/observances/
education-day
Let’s see what Human Rights
are because many people, due
to their lack of knowledge,
are deceived by the States that
claim to give privileges to citizens
and what they do is give
what is their obligation and
maintain the discourse that
they are wonderful for everything.
What they do when it is
their obligation.
Universal Declaration
of Human Rights
All human beings are born
free and equal.
All people have all the rights
of this Declaration.
Every person has the right:
To the life.
No one may be subjected to
slavery.
No one will be subjected to
torture.
Every person: has the right
to be recognized in his or her
personality.
It is equal before the law.
They have the right to effective
recourse before the law.
No one can be arbitrarily
detained.
Everyone has the right to be
heard publicly:
He or her has the right to be
presumed innocent.
No one will be subject to
interference in her private life.
You have the right to:
Move freely.
To seek asylum.
To a nationality.
To find a family.
To private and collective
property.
To freedom of thought.
To the expression freedom.
To freedom of assembly.
To participate in the government
of your country.
To social security.
To work.
To rest.
To social services.
To education.
To cultural life.
For Human Rights to be
made effective.
Has duties to the community.
Nothing in the Declaration
of Human Rights can be
interpreted differently. United
Nations. Peace, Dignity and Equality on a healthy planet.
https://www.un.org/es/about-us/universal-
declaration-of-human-rights
We may ask ourselves by
what means we can make
everyone aware of their rights
as human beings. The best
instrument is education.
“Education is key to sustainable
development. When the
2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development was adopted,
the international community
recognized that education is
essential to the success of
its 17 goals. Goal number 4
of Sustainable Development
specifically aims to ‘ensure
inclusive and equitable quality
education and promote
lifelong learning opportunities
for all’ by the year 2030.”
https://www.un.org/es/observances/
education-day Education is so important
that the World Bank committed
to helping achieve goal 4 of the
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG 4. Without a people, a Nation
without Education we can
achieve little.
The World Bank committed
to helping achieve the Sustainable
Development Goal – SDG
4, which works for equitable,
inclusive, and quality education.
World Bank. Press release. 2024,
04. https://www.worldbank.org/es/
topic/education/overview
We are living in a world
that seems unknown to us: an
abundance of science, but also
hate speech. What is happening
to human beings? Will the
human species disappear along
this path?
The human species will not
disappear because we were born
to build. Human beings, by our
nature, need others to grow, to
learn. If we were as a society
building the path to disappear,
we would have already done so
many centuries ago.
We are living a stage of great experience, some would say,
to learn the value we have. At
these moments in History, we
are witnessing a few who could
not have had more hate speech
and misinformation. We will
learn to value who we are and
how much we can grow.
It seems that the other one
doesn’t exist. We must learn
the value of the other, the ways
of coexistence.
We must learn, we must
study to know where we are
going, to understand the way
of being with others.
You are studying and studying
should be to grow and to
give to others. You do your
program at Atlantic International
University (AIU):
Study and you will grow.
Give to others
so you can be happy.
Only in this way we will
all live growing.
Only this way we will
live in peace.
BIBLIOGRAPHY. Banco Mundial. Comunicado de Prensa. 2024.
04. https://www.bancomundial.org/es/topic/education/overview | Naciones
Unidas. Día Internacional de la Educación. 2024. enero 24. https://
www.un.org/es/observances/education-day | Organización de las Naciones
Unidas. Paz, Dignidad e Igualdad en un planeta sano. https://www.
un.org/es/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights | Universidad
Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM. Archivos jurídicos- p. 46-
47. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/3/1461/5.pdf | Universidad
Nacional Autónoma de México - UNAM. Archivos jurídicosp.
46. https://archivos.juridicas.unam.mx/www/bjv/libros/3/1461/5.pdf
I. Introduction
This study employed pragmatic
world view coupled with
mixed methodology design
and research approach (Creswell,
2014). The main focus was on
how the eucalyptus tree species
impact ground water depletion.
As the survey process
progressed, it was noted that,
a paradigm shift is needed in
groundwater management,
from technocratic approaches
to use of collaborative, participatory
knowledge systems.
Groundwater users, technical
specialists, scientists and
policy makers need to work
jointly with the support of
facilitators, and backed by
demonstration results, learning
and communications.
They should collaborate to
align groundwater knowledge,
governance reforms, economic
incentives, investment and
social organisation. Smith
(2016), associates the tree’s
fast growth, adaptability to a
wide range of environments and socio-economic roles it
plays to its global support
it has gained. Since 1980’s
International Monetary Fund
(IMF) promoted tree plantations.
In compliance to IMF’s
call most countries worldwide
adapted to establishing plantations
with the earth covered
by forestry plantations which
increased from 167 million to
277.9 million hectares from
1990 to 2015. Brazil, Argentina
and Chile comprise the largest
areas of forestry plantations in
South America. Currently Brazil
has about 7.8 million hectares
of planted forests, mainly eucalyptus
(5.7 million hectares)
and pinus (1,6) (Tiago Souza Mattos,
2019). As for the African region,
forestry plantations were earmarked
to meet increased demand
for domestic industries,
export, fuel wood and charcoal,
together with the demand for
an array of non-wood products.
Pressure has been exerted
on natural forests as a result
of urbanisation and above all human population growth. As
such production levels are; 1.76
million in W. Africa, 0.15 in E.
Africa, 0.05 in C. Africa and
2.2 million in Southern Africa
(Chamshama and Nwonw u, 2004). While
the above production levels
were mainly inclined to meet
economic targets, plantation
forests could play ecological
roles in buffering floods,
increasing interception rates,
decreasing surface runoff as
well as contributing to an
accumulation of soil organic
matter (Bonn esoeur etal, 2019).
The purpose of this study
is to alert farmers on the
controversial impact paused
by the eucalyptus tree species
on ground water depletion, a
phenomenon that seemed to
be silent among the group of
people and has led to diverting
of the cropping programmes on
certain lands as well as shifting
farmers from old farming sites
relocating themselves to new
sites of favourable conditions.
Targeted farmers in question
seem to be a neglected group
by most studies because of
their farmland sizes and location
(Subsistence farmers).
Most studies concentrated on
big forestry plantations ignoring
small forestry tree establishments
(less than 1 hectare
plantations).
Water depletion on ground
water sources was mainly
attributed to climate change,
putting very little blame on
other factors if not none at
all except for experts in the
area of hydrological studies.
The study will demystify the
dilemma of only associating
ground water shortage to poor
precipitation. Inclusion of this minority group in the study
closes the gap left by most
researchers.
Various studies based on
forestry tree plantation concentrated
much on the production
side with less input on
expatiating the negative impact
paused by such plants in particular
the eucalyptus species.
Timberwatch Coalition and
World Rainforest Movement
(2016) concentrated on projects
earmarked at exploiting all
African patches with a potential
to produce timber and to
include countries falling within
West, East, Central and Southern
Africa. White etal (2916)
consider eucalyptus as contributing
to positive development
through retention of soil in its
natural state as well as providing
wood-based products.
Negatively however, note the
trees as impacting the availability
of underground water
levels by excessively drawing
it than what the soil should
retain. Studies by Rotzer etal
(2016) view forest trees as
natural water balancing bodies
regulated by climatic conditions
variation in which losses
can be restricted through stoma
closure or emitted as stoma
open and thus maintaining an
uncompromised water balance.
This Scientific view is
shared with that of Braun etal
(2004) where ground water
levels are naturally regulated contributed much to the tree’s
loss of credibility which is the
nerve centre of this study. This
implies that continuous production
of the tree species in
drought threated regions would
render the people into great
food security risks.
II. Study methodology
This study specifically
used exploratory sequential
mixed method approach
where the researcher began
with a qualitative research
phase in exploring the views
of 24 farmers selected from 52
Ward 20 villages of Cikomba
District in the Mashonaland
East province -Zimbabwe...
The data was then analyzed,
and the information used to
build into a second, quantitative
phase. The qualitative
phase was used to construct
the questionnaire instrument
that best fits the sample under
study (Creswell, 2014). The study
used 3 ponds as a 3-year case
study after prior observation
of some water level changes
in ponds and other areas that
used to be marshy at certain
times of the year but have
totally changed as nearby eucalyptus
tree canopy increased.
The questionnaire contained
the purpose of planting the
tree, justification on the choice
of the site; awareness on how
the tree could impact ground
water sources levels and views on action to take in getting rid
of wrongly sited plantations.
Concurrently observations were
made to determine how the
tree species impacted ground
water levels. Questionnaire
contents were schematised.
III. Results
and discussion
With reference to Table 1,
33.3% the respondents planted
trees around their cropping
areas irregardless of where
the farmland was situated and
could not have been aware on
how the trees could impact
crop productivity which the
trees later did as their canopies
increased. 29% of the respondents
aimed at establishing
timber for general home
use and tree establishment
to them had to be anywhere
as long as they managed to
get timber for the intended
purpose. 25% of those utilising
idle land were also not site
restrictive as they were targeting
at open spaces. Draining
excess water by 12.5% of the
respondents was site specific
on earmarking wetlands.
Heterogeneous and egocentricity
that existed among the
respondents depicted how
liberal the pattern of planting
was, as evidenced randomised
tree establishment.
Data in table depicts that
the trees were planted in
wetland constituting 41.7% of the respondents and the
wetlands could be within the
water course or near water
sources where vegetable gardens
could be located. 33.3%
of the demarcated farm land
could be gardens near water
sources (Figure 1) at high water
demanding eucalyptus trees
which create a high water
gradient and deplete underground
water nearby. A 25%
utilising of available land could
in-discriminatorily included
wetlands which have probabilities
of being left out as unsuitably
for cropping purposes and
yet are an underground water
source. Exposing eucalyptus to
wetlands subjects the land to
water depletion especially on sites with limited water supply
as the case with the sites under
study. Coining the results of
the study to empirical findings
by Joshi and Palasami (2011)
where the tree said to draw as
much as 90 litres of water per
day. (Figure 2)
Table 3 reflects that 16.7% of
the respondents were the only
people who were aware that
eucalyptus trees could deplete
ground but could be the same
people who did not plant trees
on water depletion sites. 83.3%
of the respondents could have
wrongly sited their plantations
(Figure 1) due to ignorance and
could be the group that could
have benefited from the outcomes
of the study.
Table 4 shows an 83.4%
outweigh of those who felt the
trees could remain on wrongly
sited lands as long as they
served anticipated social and
economic roles constituted by
16.7%. The results could mean
that, production of other basic
crops outweighed benefits obtained
from eucalyptus probably
because economic benefits
of the tree at small scale are
not forthcoming.
IV. Conclusion
The advantages drawn from
the study have showcased that;
• Commercial benefits derived
from eucalyptus trees after
manufacturing do not matter
most at small scale production
than what people could do without the tree.
• People’s attitudes in the
management of the water
resource could change for
the better.
• People could accept the tree
be grown at commercially
selected sites other than
haphazard planting which
tend to threaten underground
water resource.
• Up to 90 litres of water
discharged by the tree (Joshi
and Palanisani 2011) in the dry
season could be difficult to
compensate under dry season
conditions where rural
people would need water
most for watering their
vegetable crops therefore its
removal serves a lot of water.
• Small farm setups may not accommodate the production
of the tree because once
the tree colonises the area,
reduction of space for basic crop production results aggravating
famine and thus
contributing to high social
costs for governments.
In as much as the study has
justified the need to discourage
people from establishing
eucalyptus trees in areas
where land size and use
might not permit, incorrect
handling of the study outcomes
might result in;
• Sedimentation of water
sources due to complete
removal of the tree where it
could serve the purpose.
• Disruption of the hydrological
cycle in areas which are
naturally bare and a bit
further from water sources
where the tree could serve
the purpose.
• Relocating the farmers
threatened by depleted water
sources in areas they were
used to depend on available
water could be a bit expensive
as there is need to find
alternatives like sinking
costly boreholes for individual
poor rural farmers.
• There are some challenges
to convince people to get
rid of their small plantations
for the good of availing
water for the farmer
whose farming activities are
situated at lower sites of the
plantations.
Acknowledgement
The author is grateful to the
sons Vigil N Gwemende and
Redemption M Gwemende for
running around on questionnaire
distribution.
REFERENCES. [1]. John W. Creswell (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative
and Mixed Methods Approaches 4th Ed, SAGE, Los Angeles/London/New Delhi Singapore/
Washington DC. [2]. Branum, C.I., Eberts, S.M., Jones S.A. and Harvey, G.J. (2004)
Water–level variation and their effects tree growth and mortality on the biochemical
systems at the phytoremediation demonstration site in Fort Worth , Texas, 1996–2003,
U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2003–5107, 39pp. [3]. Mark Smith,
Katharine Cross, Mary Paden and Peter Laban (eds.) (2016) spring–managing groundwater
sustainably IUN, Grand, Switzerland. [4]. Mukund1 Joshi and K. Palanisami. Impact
of Eucalyptus Plantations on Ground Water Availability in South Karnataka, ICID 21 1st
International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, 15–23 October 2011, Tehran, Iran.
[5]. S.A.O. Chamshama and F.O.C. Nwunwo (2004) A report prepared for the project,
“Lessons Learnt on Sustainable Forestry Management Africa, African Forestry Research
Network (AF3ORNET), and FAO. [6]. Tiago Souza Mattos, Paulo Tarso Sanches, de Oliveira,
Muliro Caser Lucas and Edson Wenland (2019) Groundwater Recharge Decrease Replacing
Pasture by Eucalyptus Plantations, muliroclucas@gmail.com; Tel +55–46–3220-2560.
[7]. Timberwatch Coalition (South Africa) Industrial Forestry Tree Plantations Invading
Eastern & Southern Africa, Ph +37834442083, October 2016. [8]. T. Rotzer, R. Matyssek,
G. Schiitze, H. Pretzsch, K. H. Haberke, C. Kallenbach. (2017) Tree Species and size drive
water consumption of beech / spruce forests —a simulation study highlighting growth,
under water limitation, Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland DOI 10.1007 /
S11104–017–3306–X. [9]. Vivien Bonnesoeur, Bruno Locatelli, Manuel R. Guariguata, Boris
F. Ochoa – Tocachi, Veerle Vanacker, Zhun Mao, Alexio Stokes, Sarah–Lan Mathez– Stiefei,
Paper published in Forest Ecology and Management (2019) https://dioi.org/106/j foreco.
2018–033. [10]. White, D.A. Battaglia M. and Mendham D.S. 2016. Water use and water
productivity of Eucalyptus plantations in South East Asia. ACIAR Technical Reports Series
No. 89. Centre for International Agricultural Research Camberra 55pp.
Dr. Franklin Valcin Presi den t/Academic Dean |
Dr. José Mercado Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board of Trustees |
Ricardo González, PhD Provost |
Dr. Ricardo Gonzalez Chief Operation Officer and MKT Director |
Linda Collazo Logistics Coordinator |
AIU Tutors Coordinators: Deborah Rodriguez Amiakhor Ejaeta Amanda Gutierrez William Mora Miriam James Admissions Coordinators: Amalia Aldrett Sandra Garcia Junko Shimizu Veronica Amuz Alba Ochoa Jenis Garcia Judith Brown Chris Soto René Cordón Dr. Anderas Rissler Academic Coordinators: Dr. Adesida Oluwafemi Dr. Emmanuel Gbagu Dr. Lucia Gorea Dr. Edgar Colon Dr. Mario Rios Freddy Frejus Dr. Nilani Ljunggren De Silva Dr. Scott Wilson Dr. Mohammad Shaidul Islam |
Dr. Miriam Garibaldi Vice provost for Research |
Carolina Valdes Human Resource Coordinator |
|
Dr. Ofelia Miller Director of AIU |
Carlos Aponte Teleco mmunications Coordinator |
|
Clara Margalef Director of Special Projects of AIU |
David Jung Corporate/Legal Counsel |
|
Juan Pablo Moreno Director of Operations |
Bruce Kim Advisor/Consultant |
|
Paula Viera Director of Intelligence Systems |
Thomas Kim Corporate/ Accounting Counsel |
|
Felipe Gomez Design Director / IT Supervisor |
Maricela Esparza Administrative Coordinator |
|
Kevin Moll Web Designer |
Chris Benjamin IT and Hosting Support |
|
Daritza Ysla IT Coordinator |
Maria Pastrana Accounting Coordinator |
|
Daritza Ysla IT Coordinator |
Roberto Aldrett Communications Coordinator |
|
Nadeem Awan Chief Programming Officer |
Giovanni Castillo IT Support |
|
Dr. Edward Lambert Academic Director |
Antonella Fonseca Quality Control & Data Analysis |
|
Dr. Ariadna Romero Advisor Coordinator |
Adrián Varela Graphic Design |
|
Jhanzaib Awan Senior Programmer |
Vanesa D’Angelo Content Writer |
|
Leonardo Salas Human Resource Manager |
Jaime Rotlewicz Dean of Admissions |
|
Benjamin Joseph IT and Technology Support |
Michael Phillips Registrar’s Office |
|
Rosie Perez Finance Coordinator |
||