AIU News + Essays + Education + Culture + Science + Technology + Art + Design + Body + Mind + Spirit + Environment + Human Rights + Animal rights + Geography + About AIU
Benaired Mohamed Doctor of Management Human Resources Management Algeria |
Fátima da Ressurreição S. Chico C. Bachelor of Accounting Accounting and Finance Angola |
Jorge Futi Bras Barros Bachelor of Science Computer Science Angola |
Simao Chicaia Master of Business Administration Business Administration Angola |
Elsa Joaquina Jele Celestino Capoco Bachelor of Business Administration Business Administration Angola |
Bouchon Barbier Pedro José Bachelor of Psychology Occupational Psychology Argentina |
John Chuol Muon Master of International Relations International Relations Australia |
Enrique Garrido Arosemena Doctor of Education Education Bolivia |
Boukary Zorom Bachelor of Business Administration Business Administration Burkina Faso |
Ghepejem Jean Bachelor of Science Healthcare Administration Cameroon |
Henri Lucien Kamga Fouamno Master of Public Health Infectious Disease Epidemiology Cameroon |
Paola Andrea Schönffeldt Soto Doctor of Education Education Chile |
Luis Antonio Poblete Oñate Bachelor of Business Administration Business Administration Chile |
Manuel José Ramírez Álvarez Bachelor of Science Gastronomy Colombia |
Maria José D'Silva Zamora Bachelor of Education Education Colombia |
José Ángel Alzate Gómez Master of Business Administration Business Administration Colombia |
Alphonse Muntuabo Mubengayi Master of Science Electrical Engineering and Energy Mgmt. Congo |
Katola Kalungo Emery Bachelor of Management Occupational Health and Environmental Mgmt. Congo |
Nduda Luamba Joseph Doctor of Science Computer Science Democratic Republic of Congo |
Alenny Rivas Santos Master of Science Industrial Engineering Dominican Republic |
José Manuel Ruiz Fernández Master of Arts English Literature Dominican Republic |
María José Díaz Buitrón Bachelor of International Business International Business Ecuador |
Juan Carlos Quevedo Burnham Bachelor of Arts Architecture Ecuador |
Byron Xavier Cabrera Bulla Bachelor of Education Mathematics Ecuador |
Gabriel Felipe Ábrego De Paz Bachelor of Education Education El Salvador |
Baltasar Nseng Mesian Abaga Bachelor of Legal Studies Legal Studies Equatorial Guinea |
Kofi Ansu Kumi Certificate of Social and Human Studies Theology Germany |
Kimberly E. Maurer Doctor of Science Psychology Greece |
Jorge Francisco Retolaza Doctor of Education Public Administration and Public Policies Guatemala |
Karen Suzely Sandoval Díaz Bachelor of Science Information Systems Guatemala |
Marco Antonio Marroquin Morales Bachelor of Science Mecha nical Electrical Engineering Guatemala |
Lucrecia María Ibarguen Castillo Bachelor of Psychology Addictions Guatemala |
Jessie Thom Doctor of Business Administration Climate Cha nge Guyana |
Silvia Carolina Valderramos Cano Master of Business Administration Business Management Honduras |
Fiorella Paulette Coca Palacios Bachelor of Nutrition Science Dietetics Honduras |
Sabrina Beretta Bachelor of Chemistry Nutrition Italy |
Pedro Arturo Pérez Rosabal Certificate of Management Network Management Jamaica |
Diala Abou Daher Doctor of Business Administration Healthcare Administration Lebanon |
Claudia Browne-Nasser Master of Human Resource Management Human Resource Management Liberia |
Fernanda Hernández Martínez Bachelor of International Business International Business Mexico |
Cristina Anina Dias Siquela Bachelor of International Relations International Relations Mozambique |
Akintunde Emmanuel Soji Bachelor of Science Mecha nical Engineering Nigeria |
Odioh Susannah Doctor of Philosophy Education Nigeria |
Abdurrazaq Iliyasu Doctor of Business Administration Business Administration Nigeria |
Ebiwari Owei Doctor of Philosophy Project Planning and Management Nigeria |
Ukah Kingsley Obinna Bachelor of Science Software Engineering Nigeria |
Abdulwaheed Newton Yusuf Bachelor of Science Electrical Engineering Nigeria |
Francy Nicolle Jaime Pittí Bachelor of Arts Architecture Panama |
Jaime Esteban Mitchell Harper Doctor of Science Geographical Information Systems Panama |
Lucina Salazar Puerta Doctor of Education Educational Administration Peru |
Ana Maritza Castillo Morán Bachelor of Business Administration Business Administration Peru |
Fatima Mckoll Kristel Milla Dulanto Bachelor of Humanities Psychology Peru |
Renato Mariano Chavez Rodriguez Bachelor of Business Administration Business Administration Peru |
Pariona Quintana Caen Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering Peru |
Jose Manuel Laiza Asencios Bachelor of Science Electrical Engineering Peru |
Mohammed Ali AlShehri Doctor of Philosophy Healthcare Administration Saudi Arabia |
Sahr Entua Yambasu Doctor of Philosophy Statistics Sierra Leone |
Alhajie Sallieu Kanu Doctor of App lied Linguistics and Literature Applied Linguistics and Literature Sierra Leone |
Juanita Daffie Bachelor of Education Education in Senior Pha se South Africa |
Rothmy Abner Rodriguez Cohen Bachelor of Business Administration Business Administration Spain |
Phindile Andile Nhleko Bachelor of Science Psychology Swaziland |
Yusuf Uzunkaya Bachelor of Business Business Administration Turkey |
Faruk Aydin Bachelor of Science Electronics and Communications Engineering Turkey |
Yalçın Gökçen Bachelor of Science Electrical Engineering Turkey |
Maria Estela Almada Bachelor of Public Health Health Research Uruguay |
Breshna Sokout Bachelor of Arts Communications USA |
Alfonzo Bolivar Salvatierra Doctor of Business and Economics Marketing USA |
Paola Stephania Franco Moreno Master of Education Special Education USA |
Tawabeh Yuh Jerome Master of Science Architecture USA |
Anuoluwa Abidemi Ajose Master of Science Environmental Engineering USA |
Fathiya Musa Ajab Doctor of Biology Cellular Biology USA |
Nidia Ivette Garza Doctor of Philosophy Organizational Leadership USA |
Roldan Wilfredo Gonzalez-Penaranda Bachelor of Science Industrial Security USA |
Fred Kasongu Post-Doctorate of Science Mining Management Zambia |
Banda John Doctor of Project Management Project Management Zimbabwe |
Norbert Muvhiringi Master of Physical Education Sports Nutrition Zimbabwe |
||
Coronavirus, namely
severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus
2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible
for coronavirus disease
(COVID-19). Coronavirus is
emerged in the city of Wuhan,
China, in 2019 and has since
caused a large scale COVID-19
pandemic and spread to more
than 222 other countries/areas/
territories is the product
of natural evolution.
As of December 20, 2020
globally 75,110,651 persons
were infected. Out of these,
1,680,395 were death (WHO).
Worse case scenarios were
identified in USA with
17,314,834 confirmed cases
with 1,680,395 death tolls.
After that Indian casualties
were high with 10,031,223
confirmed cases and 145,477
death tolls.
This COVID-19 pandemic
disrupted global three pillars of
sustainability: ecology, society
and economy. Environment
is a part of ecology. Contaminated
environment infected
COVID-19 disease exponentially.
Later on this spread
widely through transboundary
environmental mobility. The
infected persons experienced
social and psychological
problems due to compulsory
requirement of institutional
and home quarantine over long
time. The obvious results of
these environmental and social
problems by COVID-19 pandemic
caused negative impact
on economy. To cut outbreak
of this infectious COVID-19
pandemic, worldwide communication
became seized. Vulnerable
countries locked down
their geographical boundaries,
suspended land, water and air
communications and advised
their people not to communicate
in and out of the country
concerned. These caused
complete breakdown of local,
regional and global supply
chains. If these continue over
long time, there will be scarcity
of necessary commodities.
Effect of this will be revealed
in raise in commodity price.
Sooner or later the vulnerable
people will need to spend more
money to buy their necessary
commodities. In fact after one
year of COVID-19 pandemic,
this becomes rampant.
Due to COVID-19 pandemic,
questions striking in mind
are: what lessons we have
learnt? What experiences we
have accumulated? And what
opportunities we can offer to
coup the present and future
similar crisis? Answers to
these questions most probably
would be helpful to restore
contemporary global balance
of three pillars of environmental
sustainability: ecology,
society and economy.
Significant lessons we have
learnt are: use of personal
protective equipments (PPEs)
to cut down disease spreading
and process of development
of a suitable vaccine to foster
immune system against this
COVID-19 disease. PPEs helped
to cut down disease spreading
in wider extent otherwise
most probably there would be
partial extinction of human
species from this world due
to absence of a suitable drug.
Other lesson we have learnt
is the process of development
of a suitable vaccine by application
of existing and new
biotechnology.
Advanced biotechnological
experiences are crucial to
develop COVID-19 vaccine.
USA biotech companies Pfizer
and Mordana have developed
their vaccines based on the
virus’s genetic instructions
for building the spike protein.
The vaccines use messenger
RNA, genetic material that our
cells read to make proteins.
The molecule —called mRNA
for short— is fragile and would
be chopped to pieces by our
natural enzymes if it were
injected directly into the body.
To protect their vaccines, Pfizer
and Mordana wrap mRNA
in oily bubbles made of lipid
nanoparticles and store at
-70oC. After injection, the vaccine
particles bump into cells
and fuse to them, releasing
mRNA. The cell’s molecules
read its sequence and build
spike proteins. The mRNA
from the vaccine is eventually
destroyed by the cell, leaving
no permanent trace. Later
on this spike protein develops
antibody against corona
virus (SARS-CoV-2) which
is responsible for COVID-19
disease. This is how Pfizer’s
and Mordana’s vaccines work.
British-Swedish pharmaceutical
company AstraZeneca
in collaboration with Oxford
University have developed another
COVID-19 vaccine.
The
Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine
is made from a cold-causing
adenovirus that was isolated
from the stool of chimpanzees
and modified so that it no
longer replicates in cells. When
injected, the vaccine instructs
human cells to produce the
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein —the
immune system’s main target
in coronaviruses. Likewise the
previously mentioned vaccines,
this spike protein also develops
antibody against the corona
virus. In phase III clinical trials,
these vaccines were claimed to
be 95-70% effective. Due to lack
of adequate data, solid conclusion
could not be made at this
stage but these vaccines got
approval from drug administrations
of few countries
to coup up the dangerous
pandemic. These biotechnological
experiences we have
accumulated while worked
with COVID-19 pandemic.
These scientific lessons and
experiences also offer opportunity
to coup up with similar
crisis in future. This time COVID-
19 vaccines took almost
10 months to be developed.
Taking advantage of the previous
lessons and experiences,
it might be possible to develop
vaccine to coup up with future
pandemic if any in even
shorter time span.
We don’t want to have this
type of pandemic in our beautiful
world in future. We should
avoid this in what so ever way
we can to retain global balance
of contemporary environmental
sustainability for the greater
interest of mankind.
Abstract
This article examines child
psychological pathology, parental
philosophy and positive
parenting and subsequently
provides access to a framework
for parental assessment:
this article will examine section
1: “Parenting Functioning”
on the following key factors
by explicating variations
of models under the main
hypothesis —The best way
to get started on positive
parenting: clinical psychology.
The section begins
by defining the importance
of a child nurtured in an
early age: parenting and it’s
scienctific correlation, briefly
explains time and its effect on
parenting, this then reviews
the five parenting styles and
their Clinical Practice and
Level of adaptive behaviour.
Background
Lack of positive parenting
and not having a clear
direction on where to go for parenting help has driven
children and youth to leave
home before their readiness
to leave home, live in
homes with parents with no
literal parent figure present,
increases the number of dysfunctional
families, increases
concealed homelessness and
sleeping rough in young adults
which subsequently increases
the number of adolescents and
children in state care; foster
care, emergency accommodation,
homeless and hidden
homelessness and sleeping
rough. Managing this flow
and developing a framework
to support positive parenting
style has been a major shortcoming
in our society today.
Introduction
Coming up with a positive
parenting philosophy can be
a challenge. How you decide
to impart and teach a child
can be a key element when
it comes to raising a child,
knowing the child, establishing
mutual respect and a line
of open communication. This
article is an intervention guide
that mirrors responsibility for
all issues relating to parenting.
Parents need to secure
resources, articulate a vision
of what childhood should be
about and how parents can be
helped in providing the best
possible care for their children.
It will examine child’s
psychological pathology, parenting
philosophy and positive
parenting subsequently access
to a framework for parental
assessment
The importance of a child
nurtured in an early age:
parenting and it’s scienctific
correlation
According Bronson and
Merryman, school-aged children
whose mothers nurtured
them early in life have brains
with a larger hippocampus.
What is the hippocampus? The
hippocampus is a key brain
structure important to learning,
memory and stress response.
This research focuses
on the amygdala, which is the
area of the brain connected to
emotional memory and reactions,
and the hippocampus,
which consolidates information
from short-term memory
to long-term memory. The
Washington University School
of Medicine research shows
that the critical region of children’s
brain anatomy is linked
to a mother’s nurturing. This
research shows that full 10
percent in hippocampal mass
between nurtured children
and their extremely neglected
counterparts. The way children
are treated in their early
years is important not only for
the child’s emotional development,
but also in determining
the size of their brains. The size and growth of the brain’s
structures relates directly to a
child’s potential for learning,
as well as long- and shortterm
memory, and lifelong appropriate
stress responses. The
way a child is parented has a
deep and indelible impact on
that child’s life
Time and its effect
on parenting
Time is one of the major
factors that can influence
or inhibit parental functioning
depending on how it is
handled. According to paw
research (Parenting children in
the age of screens) shows that
roughly seven-in-ten parents
(68%) say they are at least
sometimes distracted by their
smartphone, with 17% saying
this happens often. Statistic
flow: parenting demand
and screen: S Aman-Back, K
Björkqvist survey showed the
self-reported amount of active
engagement time for parents.
The amount of parental quality
time decreased with the
age of the child, the average
across age groups being 4.4
+/- 3.0 hr. for mothers and 3.0
+/- 2.9 hr. for fathers per day
and children reported spending
roughly 1 hour more time
with their parents than the latter
reported (total hours 5.4+).
According to the comparison
parental commitment chart
on the statistics flow of this
research shows that this age
parenting spends more time
on screen and less time on
parenting as required. Statistically,
the more technology
advances the lower the slope
drops below the equilibrium
of positive parenting. As the
time spent on the screen
increases (the slope rises) it
automatically reduces the time
spent on parenting (the slope
decreases). The total parenting
estimated time = 5 hrs 40
mins daily according S Aman-
Back, K Bjorkavist survey
depend on age. The equilibrium
on parental commitment
based on this research
chart is 2 hrs 30 mins = 50%.
According Paw Research on
parental commitment 68% =
1 hr 45 mins operating below
the equilibrium, sometimes
distracted, more time spent
on smartphone. However, if
the time spent daily drops
below the equilibrium, then
parental pressures arise giving
rise to societal dysfunction;
where social disorganisation,
social pathology or social
dysfunction are analytical
contexts in which the determinist
relationship between
crime and society are clearly
suggested (Young, 1981). The
higher the number of quality
of parenting hours spent daily
will determine the quality of
societal relational structures.
This means that parenting of
this age is experiencing time
constraints and the dynamic
paradigm shift of technology
is having negative impact on
positive parenting.
Parenting functioning
Parenting style has big
impact on how children
develop into adults and there
are important implications for
their future success. Under
the hypotheses of parenting
Functioning and its clinical
approach this article will
elaborate on the five main
parenting styles and their implications
for rearing successful
children and leaders. The
five parenting styles and their
clinical practice: Neglectful
parents, Permissive or indulgent
parents, Authoritarian
parents, Egocentric parents
and Authoritative parents.
(1) Neglectful parents.
When parents simply don’t
engage much in the parenting
role, spend less time with
their children and allow TV
and video games to babysit.
Clinical practice: The children
of disengaged parents had the
worst outcomes according to
the research analysis: most
did not do well in school, had
problems with peer relationships,
had trouble following
rules, had behaviour problems
due to a lack of self-control,
communication skills and
the highest levels of anxiety,
depression and drug abuse.
(2) Permissive or indulgent
parents. Attentive parents,
who provide a great deal of
warmth and interaction, with
few rules and constraints
and seem more like friends
than parents, tended to use
manipulative methods to motivate
and avoided confrontations,
preferring to be seen as
friends rather than authority
figures. Clinical practice:
according to the research
analysis, the children of permissive
parents were typically
low in self-control, low in
consideration of others, low
in achievement motivation,
few boundaries, and a sense
of entitlement, one-sided interpersonal
relationships, they
are more probable to use drugs
and leave home easily.
(3) Authoritarian parents.
This parent is adherence to
rules, a dominating style, with
a great deal of control and may
be punitive and is likely to
believe in the “spare the rod,
spoil the child” rule. They are
very critical, rigid in communication,
harsh and with
unpredictable consequences
for disobedience.Clinical Practice:
according to the research
analysis, lack of confidence,
prone to anxiety, depression,
giving in to peer pressure,
tempted to leave home before
their readiness to leave home
and more attracted to live apart
from their parents. Research
suggests that children of authoritarian
parents may lack
some of the critical social communication
skills and interpersonal
relationships skills.
(4) Egocentric parents. Tend
to be manipulative, emotion
centred parents, when it
appeases their emotion, they
apply instant gratification
and when it doesn’t it leads to
parent systematic withdrawal.
Their support is based on feelings and sentiments and
it elicits unsettlement and
dysfunctional families. Clinical
practice: child makes incorrect
assumptions about what other
people are thinking or feeling,
can feel just as empty and depleted,
low self-esteem, apathy,
unhealthy and engrossed with
feelings of isolation.
(5) Authoritative parents.
Encourage their children
to be independent at ageappropriate,
but also set limits
and boundaries, discipline
is applied, but in a supportive,
non-punitive way, high
in expectations and high in
support, give rational explanations
for their rules and expectations,
listen and take into
account their child’s perspective,
engage in give-and-take
but do not base their decisions
solely on their child’s desires,
praise positive behaviour,
involve in aged based routine
and Consequences for
misbehaviour logically related
to the child’s actions. Clinical
practice: according to the research
analysis: portrayed the
highest levels of confidence,
social skills, respect for others,
self-control, school achievement
and self-reliance.
Examining the five styles of
parental function and their
clinical practice as highlights
the superiority of authoritative
parenting
In line with Baumrind’s
early finding —now widely
replicated— that the children
of parents who are both
responsive and firm tend to be
more competent and cooperative
than children of parents
who are either authoritarian or
permissive (Baumrind & Black
1967), according to a psychologist
Laurence Steinberg, got
major confirmation from a
10-year of 20,000 families on
the superiority of authoritative
parenting, with its balanced
integration of demandingness
and responsiveness. How
the parenting styles would
play out in the teens, taking
into consideration how each
style would handle a common
parent-teen scenario: your
teenager comes home late
or after curfew. An authoritarian
parent would impose
a punishment with little or
no discussion; the emphasis
would be on following the
rule, period. A permissive parent
might be unhappy about
the lateness but would avoid a
confrontation about it. Negligent
parents probably wouldn’t
have even set a curfew, or if
they had, wouldn’t care much
about the lateness. Authoritative
parents would take the
lateness seriously. They would
find out why their child was
late, discuss the legitimacy of
the reason, and help their teen
see why a responsible person,
regardless of the reason, would
phone (or text) to let their parents
know they were safe but
would be late. The emphasis of
the authoritative parent would
be on the teen’s taking the
parent’s perspective and committing
to more responsible
behaviour in the future. If the
problem recurred, there would
be a discussion of fair consequences
to motivate future
compliance.
In Steinberg’s study, as
in Baumrind’s, teens from
authoritative families excelled
in all categories. They were the
most confident, the least likely
to abuse drugs or alcohol, and
the least likely to experience
problems with anxiety or
depression. They invested the
most time in their studies and
got the best grades.
Level of adaptive behaviour
and psychological impact
of bad parenting
and clinical practice
This will elicit the cognitive
effect of bad parenting. Clinical
Practice:
(1) Behavioural. The child
does not consider how their
actions might affect others;
this is known as antisocial behaviour.
This can lead to substance
abuse, mental health
problems, crime, critical, negative
and coercive behaviour
and poor health. Approach:
parents who do not help their
child to express their emotions
in a healthy manner will
find that their child is unable
to maintain friendships that
will cause the child to question
trust and develop low
self-confidence.
(2) Apathy. If the child is
treated with indifference at
home, then chances are high
that the child will behave the
same with others outside.
(3) Identity diffusion. Robs
the child’s off how to cope
with emotional, mental,
and physical trauma (poor
resilience).
(4) Depression. It will end
with higher susceptibility
of depression; feeling despair
that they can’t escape,
exhausted, continuous mood
swings, engrossed with the
feeling of exasperation,
isolation, unexplainably
overwhelmed.
(5) Belligerence. Many studies
have shown that traces of
aggression from a very early
age results from disconnection
between a mother and
a child’s relationship lead
to explosive anger issues in
kindergarteners.
(6) Maladaptive negative
mood. Studies have shown
that “mood” is important when
nurturing a child; speaking
with uncontrollable rage and
controlling in your discussion
all the time, then chances
are high that the child will grow up with apprehensiveness,
the tendency to behave
angrily, lack of emotional selfregulation,
poor self-esteem,
physiological stress, explosive
aggression in communication
and relationship with others
and it can become a self-destructive
pattern:
(7) Diffuse negative moods.
Moods can be diffuse with no
identifiable object. If the child
experienced severe diffuse
Negative moods at home, then
chances are high that the child
will incline to have negative
emotions such as being sad,
angry, or afraid.
Anticipation guides
are recommended
If you want to maximize
your contribution to your
child’s development of character
and competence, integrate
demandingness and responsiveness.
This balanced, authoritative
style of parenting
combines anticipation guides
are recommended:
a Confident authority that
sets high but age-appropriate
expectations.
b A high level of warmth and
support that helps children
meet those expectations.
c Rational explanations
of parents’ rules and
requirements.
d Valuing both obedience
and age-appropriate
independence.
e Fair and reasonable discipline
that holds children
accountable to expectations,
with an emphasis on the development
of responsibility.
f Parental willingness to
engage in give-and-take that
gives kids a fair hearing,
with parents making the
final decision.
g Treating children as individuals
who have needs and
feelings deserving respect.
We start the year 2021
and from the information
that we receive every day
it seems that the Coronavirus
pandemic is affecting more
people and we also have that
it has mutated.
World society hoped that for
the year and months that we
have been affected by this virus,
the situation would have
been resolved.
What has happened so that
we don’t see the end of this
pandemic come? First of all
let’s see what we have done to
live the times we are in.
We say that we are rational
beings and what we have done
as rational beings, as beings of
values, as beings of emotions?
What we see everywhere is
violence and more violence.
As Pope Francis said in an interview
—this society is either
unconscious or hypocritical.
Where that reason is? Where
those values are? Where the control of emotions is? We
have a global society that
wants to solve everything
through violence. We continue
as in the early days of the first
communities: everything resolved
through the law of the
strongest.
Another aspect to consider
is the environment that life
allows us. We are living among
hurricanes here, earthquakes
there, avalanches, river overflows.
We couldn’t be suffering
more and let’s add the lines of
people, in rich countries, waiting
for food because they don’t
have something to eat.
In our work we have developed
extraordinary scientific
thinking and with it a technology
that solves everything.
For everything we just have to
press this button or the other
and we already have the solution
to an easier way to live. It
is true that in this journey we
have left a part of society in a
precarious situation for life.
The world, in which we live,
has more facilities to carry out activities but this way of life
requires resources and people
with the necessary capacity
to live a life structured in this
way. You have to study to live
in this new world.
We are in a race of resources
and trained people. In any
case, science has an extraordinary
development.
But this world, this society
with everything achieved, it
seemed that something was
not working because it was
not possible to continue in
social violence, the extraction
of natural resources and
the garbage dump of all kinds
anywhere on the planet and
the belief in facts unreliable.
That world wasn’t going to
continue. With a world like
the one we have, the coronavirus
pandemic comes to us
and we need to see how we
get out of all the problems.
What is evident is that
violence doesn’t leave results
for national or international
problems. We have to solve
everything that happens by
winning for everyone.
If people were to see that
life is for everyone, instead
of dedicating themselves to
accumulating goods, national
and world society would be
different. If we were aware of
te value of natural resources,
we wouldn’t base the form
of production on extracting
and extracting without taking
care of giving back. We must
also see how to handle all the
products that our way of life
produces as garbage. We see
that there’re already countries
that started zero waste
production.
Science has already shown
us that those who believe in
as many situations as they
want to imagine the answer
are in the scientific. Why
are there so many infected
and sick besides the dead?
Because we don’t do what the
scientists tell us.
Now the time for vaccination
has come for everyone.
The time has come to think
about how human relationships
should be. The time has
come to think about how to
relate to nature. Now is the
time to see how to create zero
waste production. The time
has come to think that you
have to study to live in the
world of technology.
The pandemic has us, that
in all countries, it is confinement
or work until x hour
because infections and deaths
are not reduced. The pandemic
is leaving us with financial
problems. The pandemic is
generating unemployment
because production is not the
same as we had.
States have serious problems
in providing health care
to all those who are infected
with coronavirus.
States have to spend financial
resources to purchase
vaccines and dedicate human
resources to their application.
In memory of all those who
have died from the pandemic
we must:
Change the way we relate
as human beings. Change
the way we relate to nature.
Change the way we source
goods. Give science the place
it has, respecting it and applying
ourselves to knowing what
it says, studying to create a
society that we cry out for.
Those who have died as
a result of the coronavirus
pandemic ask us for these
changes from their graves. We
all hope that because a new
year began with that everything
will change.
If we don’t change everything
will remain the same
and the pandemic who knows
where it will take us. The dead
ask for it from their graves.
It is up to us whether this
pandemic ends.
Whether this world is different
depends on us.
We can do it.
We have to want to or the
dead will claim us forever
from their graves.
We have to want to do it
or every day we will be less
human being on this planet
Earth. The life we will
have depends on us,
no one else.
BIBLIOGRAPHY. Fromm, E. (2009). ¿Tener o ser? México: FCE | Lovelock, J. Entrevista - Julio -19- 2020
Retrieved from: https://www.climaterra.org/post/lovelock-la-biosfera-y-yo-estamos-en-el-%C3%BAltimo-1-de-nuestras-vidas |
Lovelock, J. – Original Interview- July- 18- 2020 Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/jul/18/
james-lovelock-the-biosphere-and-i-are-both-in-the-last-1-per-cent-of-our-lives
Dr. Franklin Valcin President/Academic Dean |
Dr. José Mercado Chief Executive Officer Chairman of the Board of Trustees |
Ricardo González, PhD Provost |
Dr. Ricardo Gonzalez Chief Operation Officer and MKT Director |
Linda Collazo Logistics Coordinator |
Dr. Silvia Restorff Academic Advisor |
Dr. Miriam Garibaldi Viceprovost for Research |
Irina Ivashuk Alumni Association Coordinator |
Dr. Prakash Menon Academic Advisor |
Dr. Ofelia Miller Director of AIU |
Clara Margalef Director of Special Projects of AIU |
Carlos Aponte Telecommunications Coordinator |
Juan Pablo Moreno Director of Operations |
David Jung Corporate/Legal Counsel |
Dr. Nilani Ljunggren De Silva Academic Advisor |
Paula Viera Director of Intelligence Systems |
Bruce Kim Advisor/Consultant |
Dr. Scott Wilson Academic Advisor |
Felipe Gomez Design Director / IT Supervisor |
Thomas Kim Corporate/ Accounting Counsel |
Dr. Mohammad Shaidul Islam Academic Advisor |
Daritza Ysla IT Coordinator |
Camila Correa Quality Assurance Coordinator |
Dr. Edgar Colon Academic Advisor |
Nadeem Awan Chief Programming Officer |
Maricela Esparza Administrative Coordinator |
Deborah Rodriguez Academic Tutor Coordinator |
Dr. Jack Rosenzweig Dean of Academic Affairs |
Chris Benjamin IT and Hosting Support |
Cyndy Dominguez Academic Tutor Coordinator |
Dr. Edward Lambert Academic Director |
Mayra Bolivar Accounting Coordinator |
Kinmberly Diaz Admissions Support Tutor |
Dr. Ariadna Romero Advisor Coordinator |
Roberto Aldrett Communications Coordinator |
Amalia Aldrett Admissions Coordinator |
Nadia Gabaldon Academic Coordinator |
Giovanni Castillo IT Support |
Sandra Garcia Admissions Coordinator |
Jhanzaib Awan Senior Programmer |
Jaime Rotlewicz Dean of Admissions |
Jose Neuhaus Admissions Support |
Leonardo Salas Human Resource Manager |
Dr. Mario Rios Academic Advisor |
Junko Shimizu Admissions Coordinator |
Benjamin Joseph IT and Technology Support |
Michael Phillips Registrar’s Office |
Veronica Amuz Admissions Coordinator |
Rosie Perez Finance Coordinator |
Rene Cordon Admissions Support |
Alba Ochoa Admissions Coordinator |
Chris Soto Admissions Counselor |
Jenis Garcia Admissions Counselor |
|