Joaquim Bumba Master of Science and Engineering Telec ommunications Angola |
Helio Abias Venancio Mota Bachelor of Business Administration Projec t Management Angola |
Leonardo Tovar Gutiérrez Doctor of Science Health Service s Administration Argentina |
José Luis Lozano Master of Arts Conflict Resolution, Mediation & Human Rights Argentina |
Eduardo Emilio Medina Bachelor of Science Civil Enginee ring Argentina |
Davin Vivake Persaud Master of Education Curriculum Development Bermuda |
Francisco Feliciano Delgado Bachelor of Science Elec trical Enginee ring Cape Verde |
Fernando Jorge Lopes Tavares Borges Doctor of Business and Economics Business Administration Cape Verde |
Maria Angelica Restrepo Molina Bachelor of Business Administration Business Administration Colomb ia |
Diana Carolina Bastidas Pantoja Bachelor of Science Clinical Psychology Colomb ia |
Edgar Fernando Lozano Muñoz Master of Business Administration Business Administration Colomb ia |
Héctor Rolando Santana Santana Doctor of Political Science Political Parties Mode l Dominican Republic |
Vilma María Bolaños Fuentes Doctor of Human Resources Human Resource s El Salvador |
Ignacio Nzambi Nzambi Angono Bachelor of Legal Studies Criminology Equatorial Guinea |
Anita Andeme Biyogo Andeme Bachelor of Business Administration Banking and Finance Equatorial Guinea |
Esther Asante Bachelor of Arts Projec t Management Ghana |
Edwin Julian Castellanos Reyes Bachelor of Administration Human Resource Administration Human Resource Guatemala |
Funsho Oladele Ibrahim Master of Arts International Relations Guinea |
Yosef Joseph Amram Doctor of Economics Economics Israel |
Frances Abigale Collie Bachelor of Science Human Resource s Management Jamaica |
Paradzai Daniel Cambela Certificate of Business Administration Business Management Mozamb ique |
Daniel Shashitwako Haikali Bachelor of Science Mec hanical Enginee ring Namibia |
Lachmanpersad Ramadhin Doctor of Science Mec hanical Enginee ring Netherlands |
Ezeakunne Chinwe Nkem Master of Business Administration Business Management Nigeria |
John Akpan Markson Doctor of Philosophy Higher Education and Promotion Nigeria |
Simplicius Udochukwu Anyahara Doctor of Philosophy Business Administration Nigeria |
Olumide, Abiodun Oluyinka Doctor of Science Construction Projec t Management Nigeria |
Uwadiae Oduware Doctor of Business Administration Business Management Nigeria |
Omayra Orozco de Alfaro Doctor of Philosophy Health and Nutrition Research Panama |
Manuel Aronategui Góndola Bachelor of Science Chemistry Panama |
Mariela Fábrega Fábrega Bachelor of Science Psychology Panama |
Angel Rodriguez Mojica Doctor of Business Administration Marketing Puerto Rico |
Hakizimana Leopord Doctor of Philosophy Information Tec hnology Rwanda |
Thomas Anthony Doctor of Philosophy Projec t Management Singapor |
Ntombi Eunice Mthunzi/ Motsa Doctor of Educational Psychology Counseling Psychology Swaziland |
Ehab Elzubair Bachelor of Journalism Journalism Switzerland |
Nurettin Doğanay Bachelor of Arts Business Administration Turkey |
Patrick Stanley Nyeko Doctor of Project Management Projec t Management Uganda |
Tesfu Weldegerima Ghebru Doctor of Philosophy Renewable and Non-Renewable Resource United Kingdom |
Gail L. Draper-Lindemann Doctor of Social Work Social Work USA |
María Isabel Maegli Novella Bachelor of Arts Arts and Crafts USA |
Angel Aguilar Bachelor of Science Computer Science USA |
Nyambe Muyunda Bachelor of Business Administration Acc ounting and Finance Zamb ia |
Edward Tsai Master of Science Psychology Zimb abw e |
||||
Abstract
Suicide remains a global
public health concern. It is
estimated to be the leading
cause of death among the
youth 12-24 years. Studies on
suicide is gaining popularity
in Ghana unlike the past when
the topic is mostly avoided. In
order to broaden the knowledge
base on suicide among
young people in Ghana, the
present study investigated the
relationship between reasons
for living, gender and suicidal
ideations. Three hundred and
eighty-three (383) senior high
students between the ages
of 13 and 19 years completed
Reasons for Living Inventory
for adolescents (RFL-A) and
Suicidal Ideation scale. Partial
correlation and Hierarchical
regression were used to
analyze the data collected.
The results revealed significant
negative relationships
between the reasons for living
(i.e., self -acceptance, family
alliance, peer acceptance and
support, future optimism and
Suicide related concerns) and
adolescent suicidal ideation.
Furthermore, the results
showed that the relationship
between reasons for
living and suicidal ideations
were significantly moderated
by gender. The results also
established that gender as an
independent factor influences
suicidal ideation. It was concluded
that suicide management
professionals such as
clinical psychologist, counsellors
should consider reasons
for living in adolescents.
Introduction
The pain and the guilt of
surviving the death of a family
member through suicide is
traumatic and the associated
experience may differ from
other types of grieve (DeLeo,
Bertolote, & Lester, 2002;
Jordan, 2001; Young, et al.,
2012). All deaths resulting
directly or indirectly from the
positive or negative act of the
victim, with his or her prior
knowledge of causing death
is termed as suicide (Ramsden
& Wilson, 2014). Simply put,
suicide means killing oneself
or a person intentionally
indulging in behaviours that
will cost his or her life. Further,
Seroff (2010) referred to
suicidal behavior as any deliberate
behavior or action with
potentially life-threatening
consequences, such as taking
a drug overdose, jumping of
high heights or deliberately
crashing a car. The method
of suicide can be relatively
nonviolent (such as poisoning
or overdose) or violent (such
as shooting oneself).
Many suicide cases are
likely not to be reported,
because of the difficulty
to identify nonviolent and
indirect suicides especially in
developing countries where
autopsy is new. Families are
not willing to report suicide
cases due to the criminality
associated with it in some
countries such as Ghana. But
this notwithstanding, suicide
is a major public health concern,
nearly 1 million people
die by suicide globally each
year (DeLeo, Bertolote, &
Lester, 2002; World Health
Organization, 2009; Young,
et al., 2012). Suicide ranks
as the suicide ranks among
the three leading causes of
death among adolescents and
young adults and the eleventh
leading cause of death in the
United States (NIMH, 2008).
Data from the National Center
for Health Statistics, USA
(2005) indicated that 8.5% of
high school students reported
attempting suicide in the
past year, and 16.9% reported having seriously considered
it. According to Dali (2009),
suicide rates in Ghana are
becoming very alarming
with more than 1,556 cases
involving 1,129 males and
427 females in the year 2008
alone. He released the figures
in a speech at a ceremony to
mark the International Suicide
Prevention Day-2009, stating
that suicide is becoming a
menace in Ghana.
The current
trends on suicide resonates
with the World Health Organization
(1999) projection that
the global suicide rate by the
year 2020 would approximate
1.53 million. Bertolote and
Fleischmann (2002) reported
that the highest suicide rates
for both men and women
are found in Europe, more
particularly in Eastern Europe,
in a group of countries that
share similar historical and
socio-cultural characteristics,
such as Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania
and, to a lesser extent,
Finland, Hungary and the
Russian Federation.
Suicide literature has implicated
gender as a significant
risk factor in suicide and attempted
suicide. The evidence
suggest that males of all ages
commit suicide at a higher
rate than females although
females attempt suicide more
often than males (Norhayati,
Amit, Che Din, & Ong, 2017).
Lewinsohn, Rohde, Seeley,
and Baldwin (2001), however,
asserted that eventhough
suicide is high among males,
suicial thoughts and attempt
were high among female
adolescents. The suicide ratio
among males and females
ranges from 2:1 to 7:1 respectively
(Kumar & Signh, 2006).
This difference can be attributed
to differences in the nurturing
of males and females
that forms the basis for gender
roles. Psychosocial correlates
of suicidal ideation has been
suggested to account for the
differences. Whereas Females
had greater fear of death/injury;
males had greater fear of
social disapproval over having
suicidal thoughts.
On the other side of the suicide
spectrum lies the reason
for living. Reasons for living
(RFL) are beliefs or expectancies
thought to mitigate
risk for suicide, and include
survival and coping beliefs,
responsibility to family,
child-related concerns, fear of
social disapproval, and moral
objections (Kwok & Shek, 2010).
There are varied and individual
specific reasons why people
live and these reasons propel
them to stay alive even in the
face of unbearable difficulties.
Other factors such as future
optimism, suicide-related
concerns (fear of death by
suicide), peer acceptance and
support, and self-acceptance
have been implicated as
protective factors against
suicide (Linehan et al. 1983).
This means that persons with
stronger future optimism,
stronger peer acceptance and
support, and closer family
alliance are less likely to
harbour suicidal thoughts. The
relationship between reasons
for living and suicide is well
established in the suicide
literature. A significantly
negative relationship has
been found to exist between
reasons for living and suicide.
To this end, the two constructs
are polarized to the extent that
the resurgence of one tame
the other to the minimal level
(Norhayati, Amit, Che Din, &
Ong, 2017). This is to say that
the stronger the reasons for
living, the weaker suicidal
thoughts and behaviours.
In a study to compare the
gender differercne in suicidal
ideations and to determine its
related risk factors. Norhayati,
Amit, Che Din, and Ong (2017)
found suicidal ideations to be
higher for males than females.
Also, whereas age predicted
male suicidal ideations, depression,
loss of motivation
and hopelessness predicted
female suicidal ideations.
Eshun (2003) also investigated
socio-cultural determinants of
suicide ideation among Ghana
and American college students.
This study revealed that
gender was a significant determinant
for suicide ideation
among Ghanaians. A study
by Kumar and Signh (2006)
among 400 adolescents drawn
from various Government
Senior Secondary schools by
using the multi-stage random
sampling in India reveals that
female adolescents scored
significantly higher on the
measures of suicidal ideation,
whereas male adolescents
have more psychological
impairment on psychopathic
deviation.
Studies conducted in the
developing countries of the
African continent show that
the trend of more attempted
suicides by women was
maintained but the rates for
completed suicide for men
were higher. In South Africa
for instance 76.8% of all suicide
attempts were made by women
(Sukhai, Harris, Moorad &
Dada, 2010). In Nigeria the ratio
for completed suicide for men
to women was 3.6 to 1, while a
study in Cairo, Egypt conducted
in 1975 reported that
there was no major difference
between the two sexes when
it came to suicide attempts
(Nwosu & Odesanmi, 2001)
Batigün (2005) conducted
a study to determine reasons
why people live by randomly
selecting 683 adolescents and
adults between the ages of
15-65. The results of the study
revealed that participants aged
between 15-25 years indicated
limited reasons for living,
higher suicide probability,
more hopelessness and loneliness
compared with old age.
A further regression analyses
suggest that level of education,
hopelessness, loneliness and
reasons for living were found to predict suicide probability.
Significant inverse relationship
has been found to exist
among hope, total reasons for
living and suicidal ideation
and attempts (Luo, Wang,
Wang, & Cai, 2016).
The foregoing evidence
about suicide predictors form
the basis for wealth of suicide
prevention strategies (Zampora,
Seburn, Brackenbury,
& Tagalik, 2005). Although
substantial efforts have been
made to understand what risk
factors contribute to suicide
and suicidal behaviour, less
attention has been paid to
clinical features that may
protect against the emergence
of suicidal behaviour (Malone,
et al., 2000). This article documents
particular risk factors
that propel suicidal ideations
and specific protective factors
that can mitigate against
adolescent suicidal ideations
from progressing to suicide
attempts. The objectives of the
study therefore was to;
• To identify which reasons for
living (e.g., family alliance,
peer acceptance and support,
self-acceptance, fear of
death by suicide and future
optimism) are stronger in
predicting suicidal ideation
• To find out whether gender
will moderate the relationship
between reasons for
living and suicidal ideation
Hypotheses
1. There would be a significant
negative relationship
between overall scores on
Reasons for Living Scale and
suicidal ideation.
2. All subscales on Reasons
for Living Scale (Future
Optimism, family alliance,
Fear of death by suicide, Peer
acceptance and Support,
and Self-acceptance) would significantly predict adolescents’
suicide ideation.
3. Gender would moderate
the relationship between
suicidal ideation and reasons
for living.
Methodology
Design
The research design was
mainly correlational in nature.
The main variables that were
investigated in the study are:
reasons for living, gender and
suicidal ideation. The research
investigated the relationship
that each variable (reasons for
living and gender) individually
have with suicidal ideation
and how they contribute together
in influencing the level
of suicidal ideation.
Participants
Three hundred and eightythree
(383) adolescents
were randomly recruited to
participate in the study. This
consisted of 182 males and
201 females. Their ages ranged
between 13 and 19 years with
an average age of 16.46 years
with a standard deviation of
1.4. There were participants
from all the ten (10) regions of
Ghana who reside in various
towns and villages. The 383
participants are justified based
on the recommendations
made by Krejcie and Morgan
(1970). According to Krejcie
and Morgan (1970), in order to obtain results that are a true
representation of the population
of about 6000 people,
(with 95 % level of confidence),
at least 361 participants should
be chosen.
Measures
Reasons for Living Inventory
for Adolescents (RFL-A) Scale
Reasons for Living Inventory
for adolescents (RFL-A) (Osman,
Downs, Kopper, Barrios, Bessett
et al ,1998). The RFL–A is
a 32-item self-report measure
designed specifically to assess
adolescents’ adaptive reasons
for not committing suicide. It
is comprised of five subscales:
Future Optimism (FO), Suicide-
Related Concerns (SRC), Family
Alliance (FA), Peer Acceptance
and Support (PAS) and Self-
Acceptance (SA). The alpha coefficients
for the RFL–A scales
were as follows: FA = .88, SRC
= .92, SA = .91, PAS = .89 and
FO = .90. The Cronbach’s alpha
index for the RFL–A total scale
was .93. The result of retest
after 2 weeks on the sample
yielded a reliability coefficient
of .87. The RFL-A follows a six
point Likert scale scoring system.
The responses are scored
as follows: 1 = Not at all important,
2 = Quite unimportant, 3
= Somewhat unimportant, 4 =
Somewhat important, 5 = Quite
important and 6 = Extremely important. This implies that
scores on the scale range from
32 to 192. Lower score means
weaker reasons for living while
higher scores indicate stronger
reasons for living.
Procedure
Prior to questionnaire, the
researcher trained research
assistance to assist in questionnaire
administration. The
training components involved
objectives of the study, ethical
issues pertaining to the study
and questionnaire administration.
Further, participants
indicated their acceptance
to partake in the study by
endorsing the consent form.
Owing to the large number of
participants, the questionnaire
was administered in groups
at the schools assembly hall.
On a whole, questionnaire
was completed between 6-10
minutes.
Data Analysis
Hypotheses one and two were
analysed using partial correlation
because these hypotheses
involve finding the relationship
between the variables involved.
In order to determine
the mediating role of gender,
the Hierarchical Multiple
Regression Analyses was used
in testing hypothesis two.
To be continued
Carl Sagan, astrophysicist,
cosmologist and disseminator
of science. He was a professor
at Harvard University.
He was also a NASA advisor
receiving the awards for
Exceptional Scientific Merits,
twice, and for Distinguished
Public Service.
NASA distinguished him
with the Apollo Achievement
Award. The American Astronautics Society awarded
him the John F. Kennedy Prize
and the National Academy
of Sciences awarded him the highest distinction: the Public
Welfare Medal.
He also received the Pulitzer
Prize. At Cornell University he
was director of the Planetary
Studies Laboratory.
He published more than 20
scientific papers.
He refers to our planet as
the pale blue dot.
That pale blue dot is motivated
by the photography of
the Earth from Voyager I, at a
distance of 6,000 million km.
The photograph was taken on
February 14, 1990.
The following text was
recited by him at Cornell University
for the first time and
appears in the book he wrote
“Pale Blue Dot, A Vision Of
The Human Future In Space”
published in 1994.
According to: “From this
distant vantage point, the
Earth might not seem of any particular interest. But for us,
it’s different. Consider again
that dot. That’s here. That’s
home. That’s us.
On it everyone you love,
everyone you know, everyone
you ever heard of, every human
being who ever was, lived
out their lives.
The aggregate of our joy
and suffering, thousands of
confident religions, ideologies,
and economic doctrines, every
hunter and forager, every hero
and coward, every creator
and destroyer of civilization,
every king and peasant, every
young couple in love, every
mother and father, hopeful
child, inventor and explorer,
every teacher of morals, every
corrupt politician, every
‘superstar,’ every ‘supreme
leader,’ every saint and sinner
in the history of our species
lived there —on a mote of dust
suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small
stage in a vast cosmic arena.
Think of the rivers of blood
spilled by all those generals
and emperors so that in glory
and triumph they could become
the momentary masters
of a fraction of a dot. Think of
the endless cruelties visited by
the inhabitants of one corner
of this pixel on the scarcely
distinguishable inhabitants of
some other corner.
How frequent their misunderstandings,
how eager they are to kill one another, how
fervent their hatreds. Our posturing,
our imagined self-importance,
the delusion that we
have, some privileged position
in the universe, are challenged
by this point of pale light.
Our planet is a lonely speck
in the great enveloping cosmic
dark.
In our obscurity —in all this
vastness— there is no hint that
help will come from elsewhere
to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world
known, so far, to harbor life.
There is nowhere else, at least
in the near future, to which
our species could migrate.
Visit, yes. Settle, not yet.
Like it or not, for the moment,
the Earth is where we make
our stand. It has been said that
astronomy is a humbling and
character-building experience.
There is perhaps no better
demonstration of the folly of
human conceits than this distant
image of our tiny world.
To me, it underscores our
responsibility to deal more
kindly with one another and to
preserve and cherish the pale
blue dot, the only home we've
ever known”. (Sagan, Pale Blue
Dot, a vision of the Human
Future in Space, The New York
Times Bestseller, 1994)
We could say that it’s a wonderful
poem, but the wonder is
what our planet means in the
life of each one of us.
Sagan tells us that in that
little blue point there are so
many activities that have been
done that anyone would say
is a huge star and it turns out
that it is not so: we’re a blue
point in space.
This wonderful writing
leaves us, rather we would
say wonderful poem, the
world we build.
That world built in such a
small space is great for what
we do.
The greatness of our world
is the greatness of our actions.
Sagan also sees the not very
good things we do.
This poem should make us
reflect on how much we can
do as human beings; build a
world as big as we want, build
the world that seems to be
needed.
We live in a world where the
communication is instantly
and we see and hear events
and not very good news.
With the greatness that we
have, what we must do is build
an ever better world.
What are you going to do to
make this pale blue dot better
and better for you?
What do you intend to do to
make this pale blue dot better
and better for others?
Do you study to have life
quality?
Are you studying to build a
happy life for you and yours? Do you think about your
work as the opportunity
to contribute something to
society?
Do you think about your
community as the space in
which you have to do something
for a better life for
everyone?
In that tiny pale blue dot suspended in space is our
life and we have to make it a
major point in our minds even
if it is so small in reality.
Never forget how
small we are in space
but how great that
with our daily living
we can make our
“pale blue dot”.
BIBLIOGRAPHY. Sagan, Carl (2003). El Punto azul Pálido, una
visión del futuro humano en el espacio. México: Planeta. Retrieved
from: https://lasteologias.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/sagan-carl-unpunto-
azul-palido-una-vision-del-futuro-humano-en-el-espacio.pdf
Great news to our AIU community
members. Last October we offered
our first Virtual conference called
“Education in the 21st Century”
Date: October 16, Wednesday
Time: From 9 am to 7 pm. (Eastern
Time of the USA)
Theme: Education in the 21st Century.
https://aiuwebinars.clickmeeting.com/aiuconferencia-
de-la-educacion-del-siglo-21
Conference Coordinator:
Dr. Edward Lambert
SCHEDULE
9:00 am
Dr. Jack Rosenzweig
Introduction
9:15 am
Miguel Angel
Gonzalez Cernuda
Applied Knowledge: The
Competitive Advantage
in the Digital World
10:00 am
Pascual Nunez
Internet Breaks Paradigms
and Idiomatic
Borders
11:00 am
Ana María Torres Hernández
Sustainable Development
from the Construction
of a Social and
Solidarity Territory
12:00 pm
Maria Laura Gianfri
From Convergent
Thought to Divergent
Thought
1:00 pm
Fernando Antonio
Espinar La Torre
Applied Ethics in Higher
Education
2:00 pm
Rosa Linda Gutiérrez
Vital Crises: Proposals
for Management and
Overcoming
3:00 pm
Hernando Murillo Gómez
What to Teach in the
Knowledge Society?
4:00 pm
Pedro de León Rivera
Professional Life with
Success
5:00 pm
José Rubén Aguilar Sánchez
Analysis of Torsion Efforts
in Rugo-Interference
through the Finite
Element Method
6:00 pm
Dr. Franklin Valcin
Conclusion
In case you are interested in any
of these topics you may contact your tutor
for more information