Joao Paulo Rosa Master of Science Environmental Health and Safety Angola |
Dulce Manuela Antunes de Oliveira Doctor of Philosophy Human Res ources Angola |
Luis Alberto Del Valle Weckesser Bachelor of Science Ports Safety and Antiterrorism Argentina |
Marcelo Ramón Mannú Master of Science Political Science Argentina |
Ngolong Emmanuel Jonas Master of Science Nutrition Science Cameroon |
Ohagwu Onyinye Emmanuel Master of Science Computer Science Canada |
Djerandouba Yotobumbeti Doctor of Social and Human Studies Public Health Chad |
Jorge Marcelino Navarro Gallardo Bachelor of Science Civil Enginee ring Chile |
Carlos Ramos Carrillo Master of Education Linguistics Colomb ia |
Fiorella Donado Osío Doctor of Literature Latin American Language and Culture Colomb ia |
Ricardo Alberto Prieto Erazo Master of Science Mechanical Enginee ring Colomb ia |
Orlando Oscar Pasin Azerrad Bachelor of Science Architecture Germany |
Carlos Alberto Orozco Orozco Master of Business Adm inistration Business Administration Guatemala |
John Patrick Oketch Master of Science Che mical Enginee ring Kenya |
Karine Kimberly Alexandra Meyers Master of Business Adm inistration Marketing Netherlands Antilles |
Mela Bamiji Bachelor of Arts International Business Nigeria |
Chukwu, Chinedu Jude Doctor of Project Management Project Management Nigeria |
Douglas Doe Audu Bachelor of Science Energy Nigeria |
Akinola Oladipo Akinsola Doctor of Management Strategic Management Nigeria |
Segun Oyeniyi Master of Science Information Technology Nigeria |
Hoodo Abdillahi Mohammed Bachelor of International Relations Economic Development & Politics North Somalia |
Roberto Martínez Suarez Doctor of Philosophy Healthcare Administration Puerto Rico |
Ajayi Oluwakemi Deborah Doctor of Philosophy International Relations Russia |
Peter Nuyaba Sam-Kpakra Master of Arts Project Management Sierra Leone |
David Ayaga Aburko Bachelor of Science Public Health South Sudan |
Sergio Gracia Ledesma Bachelor of Science Civil Enginee ring Spain |
Thelma Khombi Nkonde Doctor of Science Public Health Swaziland |
Yeliz Daşan Bachelor of Science Business Administration Turkey |
Mulumba Julius Doctor of Science Structural Enginee ring Uganda |
Edward Mike Ndawula Master of Science Electrical Power Systems Enginee ring Uganda |
Khaled M. Elabed Master of Science Political Science United Arab Emirates |
Gastón Adrian Pagano Peralta Associate of Business Adm inistration Marketing Uruguay |
Manuel José Ostia Lasso Bachelor of Science Psychology USA |
Yenny A. Ramirez Master of Arts Interior Des ign USA |
Alaa A. El-Halwagy Doctor of Business Adm inistration Business Administration USA |
Martha Ximena Niembro Nieto Bachelor of Science Nutrition USA |
William A. Rorech Bachelor of Science Electrical Enginee ring USA |
Isaac Changaya Bachelor of Metrology Legal Metrology Zamb ia |
Mildred Lwanga Mwansa Mwila Master of International Relations International Relations Zamb ia |
Charles Mutangirwa Doctor of Business Adm inistration Business Administration Zimb abwe |
||
Various attempts have
been made by scholars to
define the term “Educational
Technology”. A few of these
definitions are presented below
as follows:
(i) The Association of Educational
Communication and
Technology (AECT, 1979) defines
educational technology as "a
complex, integrated process
involving people, procedures,
ideas, and organization for analyzing
problems and devising,
implementing, evaluating and
managing solutions to those
problems involved in all aspects
of human learning".
(ii) According to Davies
(1978), educational technology
is "the development and
presentation of instructional
content using learning theories
with the aim of promoting
the achievement of predetermined
instructional objectives
and sub-systems that interact
to achieve educational goals."
In educational technology,
instructional materials of various
types are produced and
used for effective teachingleaning
activities. It makes
lessons real, concrete, nearer
home and clearer.
(iii) According to Sandoval,
V. For-lan (2010), Educational
Technology, also called Learning
Technology, is the study
and ethical practice of facilitating
learning and improving
performance by creating, using
and managing appropriate
technological processes and
resources, it includes other
systems used in the process of
developing human capability.
(iv) The Educational Technology
Act of US Congress,
quoted in Grayson, (1972: 883),
also, quoted in Unwin, D.
and McAleese (1978), defined
Educational Technology all
the hardware and software,
including television, radio,
electronic classroom, instructional
devices, still and
motion picture projectors,
computer-assisted or managed
instructional equipment and
materials, communications equipment for educational
application, and other equipment
and materials”... necessary
to assist the process
of learning. This definition
restricts the meaning of educational
technology to instructional
media, with emphasis
on the gadgets used in learning.
The concept of technology
in education is seen in terms
of physical products.
in Agun, and Imogie, (1988:2),
defined Educational Technology
as a systematic way of
designing, carrying out and
evaluating the total process
of learning and teaching in
terms of specific objectives,
based on research in human
learning and communication,
and employing a combination
of human and non-human
resources to bring about
more effective instruction. In
this definition, Educational
Technology is defined in terms
of the product and process of
technology as a way of organizing
materials and men.
(vi) Gagne (1968: 6) quoted
in Unwin, D & McAlesee
(1978:313), defined Educational
Technology as the development
of a set of systematic
techniques, and accompanying
practical knowledge for
designing, testing and operating
schools as educational
systems. ...It draws upon many
disciplines, including those
which design work space, like
architecture,... equipment, like
physical sciences; social environments,
like sociology and
anthropology ... administrative
procedures, like the science of
organizations and conditions
effective learning, like psychology.
This definition draws
attention to the various fields
that contribute to educational technology.
(vii) Rowntree, D, (1974: 2),
defined Educational Technology
as being concerned with
designing the system as a
whole; identifying aims and
objectives, planning the learning
environment, exploring
and structuring the subject
matter, selecting appropriate
teaching strategies and
learning media, evaluating the
effectiveness of the learning system and using
the insights gained
from evaluation to
improve that effectiveness
for the
future… This definition
outlines the various
operations that
are carried out in the
field of educational
technology.
The need for
standard definitions
and terms in the
field of educational
technology has
been the concern of
the Association for Educational Communication
and Technology in the United
States of America (A.E.C.T.).
After 14 years of research
work, the Association came
up with the most acceptable
and professional definition
of educational technology as
follows:
(viii) Educational Technology
is a complex, integrated
process involving people,
procedures, ideas, devices,
and organization for analyzing
problems, and devising,
implementing, evaluating
and managing solutions to
those problems involved in
all aspects of learning. In
educational technology, the
solutions to problems take
the form of all the “Learning
Resources” that are designed
and/or selected as Messages,
People, Materials, Devices,
Techniques and Settings.
The process for analyzing
problems and devising,
implementing and evaluating
solutions and identified by
the “Educational Development
Functions” of Research,
viz - Theory, Design, Production,
Evaluation, Selection,
Logistics, and Utilization. The
processes of directing or coordinating
one or more of these
functions are identified by the
“Educational Management
Functions” of Organization,
Management and Personnel
Management.
From these definitions, one
can make the following deductions
about Educational
Technology:
(i) It involves not only devices,
equipment, and media but also
people, procedures, ideas and
organization.
(ii) Emphasis is placed on a
systematic process of analyzing
problems and devising,
implementing, evaluating and
managing solutions to the
identified problems.
(iii) Educational technology
employs an integrated, holistic,
problem-solving approach.
(iv) The kind of problems that
concerns educational technology
are those problems that
pertain to all aspects of human
learning. It is concerned
with the total educational
environment not only with its
components.
When we are reading the
headline of this article
and we think: this scientist,
who is him? What has happiness
to do with him?
I start looking for who is
or was Ilya Prigogine and
increases my curiosity because
what have to do so-called
Hard Sciences with what is
happiness that is considered
a concept within the Human
Sciences. I like the relationship
because I like mathematics.
Let's see what the Hard Sciences
have to do with Human
Sciences; first of all who was
Ilya Prigogine.
Ilya Prigogine was one of
the great scientists of the last
century who even received a
Nobel Prize.
Prigogine was a scientist
born in Russia, naturalized
Belgian, who worked in
Chemistry and Physics. Born
in Moscow in 1917, he studied
Chemistry and Physics at the Brussels University and received
his PhD degree in 1941.
He devoted himself to the
study of irreversible phenomena
by creating new concepts
such as dissipative structures.
He received the Nobel Prize in
Chemistry in 1977 for his work
in Physics.
Prigogine is one of the scientists
who works in science
and considers that determinism,
as “this is a consequence
of this and nothing else”, does
not happen with the certainty
that had been considered in
science. Science is still divided
among the scientists who support
determinism, measurement
and those who put it on.
“As far as we know, some
phenomena are adequately described
by deterministic equations,
as is the case with planetary
movements, but others,
such as biological evolution,
involve stochastic processes”.
(Prigogine, 2009, p. 23).
According to Prigogine, in
sciences there are aspects that
are measurable, that remain
constant, and others, the
stochastic, which varies by
elements, such as time.
The fundamental concept
of the Prigogine proposal is
to distinguish phenomena in
the sciences that are not kept
constant to be measurable
and that the same system can
always be applied.
What this says is just an
illusion? That the sciences
were developed thanks to
the deterministic system,
thanks to introducing mathematics
to measure, but that
same science that created its development and found new
elements of knowledge also
has to look for new ways of
determining what is considered
scientific.
Faced with these new
discoveries of the behavior
of what nature offers, new
concepts must be created such
as: fluctuations, irreversibility
and finally what he called "dissipative
structures".
He tells us: “Our world is a
world of changes, exchanges
and innovation. To understand
it, a theory of the processes,
of the times of life, of the
principles and of the ends is
necessary; we need a theory
of qualitative diversity, of the
emergence of the qualitatively
new”. (Prigogine, 2009, pp. 70-71).
Prigogine is one of the scientists
whose works integrate the quantitative with the qualitative.
He accepted the measurement
offered by mathematics
but his thought was always that
there are other phenomena
that need more explanation
than mathematics. He worked
in the fields of physics and
chemistry but considered that
it was necessary to look for
ways for other phenomena that
already existed in the field of
those sciences.
His thought also took him
to the social and explained
the society within his great
research: “THE DISSIPATIVE
STRUCTURES” or THEORY OF
CHAOS.
Prigogine said: “It is evident
that a society is a non-linear
system in which what each
individual does has repercussions
and is amplified by
the effect of the socius. This
characteristic has increased
dramatically as a result of the
intensification of exchanges
of all kinds”. (Prigogine, 2009,
pp. 56-57).
Within the social the human
and happiness is given in the
human being.
According to Prigogine
dissipative structures are
processes of self-organization
within a system that is altered
by the influx of fluctuations.
“Indeed, when, instead of
disappearing, a fluctuation
increases within a system, beyond
the critical threshold of
stability, the system expresses
a deep transformation, adopts
a completely different mode of
operation, structured in time
and space, functionally organized.
What then emerges is
a process of self-organization,
what we have called "dissipative
structures”. (Prigogine,
2009, p. 89).
About life, he said:
“Life is certainly one of the most amazing manifestations
of this universal arrow
of time. From this point of
view, we can consider it as a
consequence of the existence
of irreversible processes, but
what I want to highlight is
that life, in turn, transmutes
this own situation, intrinsic to
the rupture of symmetry, to
objects of the physical world
that, without their intervention,
they would have a symmetrical
temporal behavior”.
(Prigogine, 2009, pp. 131-132).
Now begin the application
to life and to the happiness of
dissipative structures.
As human beings we are a
system, a system that is related
to other systems such as: the
governments, the culture of
which we are part, the friends
and our first system; parents.
According to Prigogine's
proposal, we are open systems
because we are related, we
let fluctuations in and these
fluctuations break the balance
and a new organization and a
new state is created.
What we have to do to build
our happiness is to identify
and know what fluctuations
will make us self-organize better
and better.
Happiness, what is it?
Happiness is growth and the
opportunity to achieve it. To
have an education throughout
life, to have a decent home, to
have the necessary medical assistance, to have the opportunity
of a job with just
compensation.
When we are far from being
happy, it is because we let in
our system, in our life, negative
fluctuations, that make us
self-organize towards aspects
that are far from giving us
satisfactions to the conditions
that make the human being
welfare to be better and therefore
be happy.
We can be self-destructing
or we can do every human
aspect better day by day.
We can think that living
in this or the other culture,
whose sign is violence, there is
no possibility of self-organizing
to be happy.
We can do it; what will
happen to us is: it will take us
more effort to maintain inner
peace to choose the best to
live satisfied with what we are
and on the way to growth as a
human being.
In this stage of your life,
who are you?
Do you identify who are you
as a human being?
Do you identify the systems
with which you relate?
Do you identify what goals
you want to achieve?
Do you know what can you
do to not self-destruct?
Do you have enough will,
to not let in to the system that
you are, the negative fluctuations
they come from wherever
they come?
What will you do so that
the fluctuations that enter in
the open system that you are
should be the best for selforganization
to be for your
happiness?
Go ahead! Let's build our
happiness! We are going to
generate self-organization, we
are going to go through the
chaos that is the changes that
are taking place until the balance
is broken and we reach
the new structure that allows
us to be happy!
We are living in fluctuations
everywhere and it seems
that they bring us into chaos;
it depends on us to organize
ourselves in such a way that
despite this chaos we are
building our happiness.
Let's do it! Goodbye to
destructive chaos and it comes
the chaos of self-organization
to be happy!
BIBLIOGRAPHY. Prigogine, I. (2009). ¿Tan solo una ilusión?.
Barcelona: Tusquest Editores.
In these days where information is
digital, it is easy to copy text from
other sources into an assignment. It
is not good to copy text from sources.
Why?
The advisors at Atlantic International
University do not want to read
the words of another person. They
want to read words that come from
your life experience, from your brain,
from your soul.
The advisors want to see your life
in your essays. They want to see that
the knowledge is passing through your
brain and finding its own expression
within you. They want to see your
soul. They want
to perceive your
experience of life
on this earth.
The only way to
see you and your
life is by reading
your own words.
At AIU, we want to
read about your community.
We want to know about where you live
and where you work. We want to see
that you are applying the knowledge to
your community. It is good to include
case examples from your community
or work in your assignments.
If you write about
your community,
you will certainly
write with your own
words.
It is important
to note AIU uses a
very efficient internet
service to evaluate the
originality of an assignment.
We do not want to see more than
30% of your work coming from other
sources. We use 30% as the standard
for the internet evaluation because
some text is likely to found in other
writings even though it is original to you. So we give you some leeway.
However, you should write your assignments
using your own words.
If you are a student that is not confident
in your English, it is still best to
write in your own words. Your original
words will be appreciated more, even if
they are not written in perfect English.
We want to hear your voice through
your words.
At AIU, we see all students as unique
and unrepeatable. We recognize your
originality as a person on this earth
and in your community.
So, be original. Be yourself. Write
with your own words.